Fix Readme#4
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @0suu, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request focuses on improving the clarity and completeness of the project's documentation. It updates the device support matrix to better explain the meaning of its status indicators and expands the instructions for running the application, providing guidance for both development and built modes. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request updates the README and device support matrix files to improve clarity and provide more accurate instructions for developers and users. The changes clarify the device support status and provide correct instructions for running the application in both development and production-like environments. I've left a few comments with suggestions to further improve the documentation's consistency and the efficiency of the documented build process.
|
|
||
| > Note / 備考: | ||
| > For now, all devices are marked as `?` (unknown / 未検証). | ||
| > The statuses in this table (`〇` / `△` / `?` / `×`) are based on the current implementation and limited manual checks, and may not be complete or up to date. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The list of statuses (〇 / △ / ? / ×) in this note doesn't cover all statuses used in the table below. For example, 'Meter' on line 66 uses 〇?, which is not defined in the legend or mentioned here. For consistency, consider either updating the status for 'Meter' to one of the defined statuses, or adding 〇? to the legend and this note.
| npm run build | ||
| npm run start |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The npm run start command re-executes the electron build step (npm run build:electron), which is already part of npm run build. To avoid this redundant step, you could change the second command to run Electron directly.
| npm run build | |
| npm run start | |
| npm run build | |
| electron . |
| npm run build | ||
| npm run start |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The npm run start command re-executes the electron build step (npm run build:electron), which is already part of npm run build. To avoid this redundant step, you could change the second command to run Electron directly.
| npm run build | |
| npm run start | |
| npm run build | |
| electron . |
1 participant
No description provided.