Hello, I am conducting the analysis of the plant autotetraploid genome using the C-Phasing software. When using C-Phasing for the identification of collapsed contigs, I used the following command:
cphasing-rs paf2depth hifi.align.paf.gz chromsizes.txt -w 5000 -s 1000 -o hifi.align.depth -t 100
cphasing collapse from-depth hifi.align.depth
I obtained the following identification results for collapsed contigs:
2026-06-11T11:13:04 [INFO] - Load /hifiasm_result_20251113/chromsizes.txt
2026-06-11T11:13:04 [INFO] - Load /hifiasm_result_20251113/hifi.align.paf.gz
2026-06-11T11:13:04 [INFO] - /hifiasm_result_20251113/hifi.align.paf.gz treated as gzip (flate2 MultiGzDecoder)
2026-06-11T11:28:05 [INFO] - Successful output coverage (window 5000bp, step 1000bp) to hifi.align.depth
[11:31:00] INFO Identified 7,554,469,736 bp contigs with collapse.py:228
read depth >= 141.36
INFO Identified 23,854,464 bp contigs with read collapse.py:236
depth < 8.08
And the result of plot.kde.plot.png shows that the average sequencing depth is 80× :
However, the actual size of this genome is 40Gb, and the HiFi data volume is approximately 800+Gb. Therefore, the actual depth should be 20×. I used the entire 40Gb of the genome to conduct the identification of collapsed contigs. Why did the c-phasing calculation come out to be 80×? Is this result available?
In addition, the collapsed contig identified by collapse is as large as 7.55Gb. This is much larger than what was observed in the HiC heatmap. Should I trust the results obtained through the collapse process or the results from the HiC heatmap instead?
Looking forward to your reply.
Hello, I am conducting the analysis of the plant autotetraploid genome using the C-Phasing software. When using C-Phasing for the identification of collapsed contigs, I used the following command:
I obtained the following identification results for collapsed contigs:
And the result of plot.kde.plot.png shows that the average sequencing depth is 80× :
However, the actual size of this genome is 40Gb, and the HiFi data volume is approximately 800+Gb. Therefore, the actual depth should be 20×. I used the entire 40Gb of the genome to conduct the identification of collapsed contigs. Why did the c-phasing calculation come out to be 80×? Is this result available?
In addition, the collapsed contig identified by collapse is as large as 7.55Gb. This is much larger than what was observed in the HiC heatmap. Should I trust the results obtained through the collapse process or the results from the HiC heatmap instead?
Looking forward to your reply.