Skip to content

Commit 4de7085

Browse files
committed
release(deps[gp-sphinx]) bump 0.0.1a16.dev4 → 0.0.1a16
why: gp-sphinx 0.0.1a16 (final) is on PyPI. Promote off the pre-release pin and drop the [tool.uv].prerelease workaround that was only needed to resolve *.devN versions. what: - bump every gp-sphinx workspace pin in pyproject.toml + uv.lock - drop the [tool.uv] block carrying prerelease = "allow"; the [tool.uv.exclude-newer-package] section it sat above is unchanged
1 parent ac3ffa4 commit 4de7085

2 files changed

Lines changed: 45 additions & 53 deletions

File tree

pyproject.toml

Lines changed: 6 additions & 13 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -70,9 +70,9 @@ vcspull = "vcspull:cli.cli"
7070
[dependency-groups]
7171
dev = [
7272
# Docs
73-
"gp-sphinx==0.0.1a16.dev4",
74-
"sphinx-autodoc-argparse==0.0.1a16.dev4",
75-
"sphinx-autodoc-api-style==0.0.1a16.dev4",
73+
"gp-sphinx==0.0.1a16",
74+
"sphinx-autodoc-argparse==0.0.1a16",
75+
"sphinx-autodoc-api-style==0.0.1a16",
7676
"gp-libs",
7777
"sphinx-autobuild",
7878
# Testing
@@ -99,9 +99,9 @@ dev = [
9999
]
100100

101101
docs = [
102-
"gp-sphinx==0.0.1a16.dev4",
103-
"sphinx-autodoc-argparse==0.0.1a16.dev4",
104-
"sphinx-autodoc-api-style==0.0.1a16.dev4",
102+
"gp-sphinx==0.0.1a16",
103+
"sphinx-autodoc-argparse==0.0.1a16",
104+
"sphinx-autodoc-api-style==0.0.1a16",
105105
"gp-libs",
106106
"sphinx-autobuild",
107107
]
@@ -135,13 +135,6 @@ typings = [
135135
requires = ["hatchling"]
136136
build-backend = "hatchling.build"
137137

138-
[tool.uv]
139-
# `[DO NOT MERGE]`: gp-sphinx workspace ships on the 0.0.1a16.devN
140-
# pre-release track until the sphinx-vite-builder integration is
141-
# proven end-to-end. uv otherwise refuses to resolve `*.dev4`
142-
# markers without this allow.
143-
prerelease = "allow"
144-
145138
[tool.uv.exclude-newer-package]
146139
# vcspull's release cadence is tightly coupled to libvcs -- a libvcs
147140
# release blocking on a 3-day cooldown blocks every contributor's

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)