Skip to content

Review CMWG collaboration infrastructure #144

Description

@cassgvp

Detail

The refreshed CMWG (initiated by the DARE UK 2025 award) should review and agree upon a core collaboration infrastructure.

This issue it to note the infrastructure to be reviewed, outcomes of relevant meeting conversations and decisions made going forwards. The below checklist represents the current state, with the relevant parts of meeting notes included in comments.

Actions

1. Meeting cadence

  • Monthly meeting (please prioritise) for active decision making
  • Fortnightly Optional Co-Working (a time to speak and work with Co-Chairs on community deliverables) - @isharma-97 please confirm meeting invites are correct.

2. Video call platform

  • MS Teams hosted by @isharma-97 at MFT.
  • Zoom license have been discussed (MFT are awaiting license). Not clear yet if/when zoom would be used over Teams.

3. Collaborative documentation

  • MFT Sharepoint is used for confidential materials

  • Cryptdrive is used for internal working docs (code and office format with reviewing)

  • Legacy material on google drive - move over to cryptdrive

  • Transparency policy ([community review requested] UK TRE CMWG Transparency Policy #148 ) updated with storage conventions

  • Relevant discussion:

    • Google docs is banned on Manchester NFT
    • Framapad is used by The Turing Way as better accessibility for screen readers
    • HackMD is valued for markdown, tagging, and syncing to GitHub
    • Agreed to stick with HackMD for now while we review the options
    • Looks like MS Teams might be necessary for restricted access docs
    • Cass will also need a Manchester NFT email to build community mapping workflow (Sharepoint lists)
    • Cryptdrive is emerging as an appropriate tool for this.

4. Slack

  • Maintain as usual for the community and Co-Chair comms. no evidence of a need to migrate the community from there at the moment.
  • Maintainers: @cassgvp check and record here

5. GitHub

  • Review org and repo membership
  • Add/downgrade/remove members where necessary
  • Review issues and project boards
  • Publish copy for the CMWG repo
  • Confirm desirability to use issues to guide meeting agendas

6. Sharing credentials

  • For management of passwords etc.
  • Other similar groups are using KeyBase - note this is no longer being updated.

Actions

  • Review requirements of Manchester NFT
  • Confirm acceptable solution

7. Events registrations

  • Previously using Luma
  • This has been acceptable and continues to be free
  • No indication of a requirement to move away from this.
  • Review whether registration/attendance information is sufficient to track engagement (likely yes, in combination with zoom export)

Actions

  • Review Luma engagement data export to confirm suitability.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions