Detail
The refreshed CMWG (initiated by the DARE UK 2025 award) should review and agree upon a core collaboration infrastructure.
This issue it to note the infrastructure to be reviewed, outcomes of relevant meeting conversations and decisions made going forwards. The below checklist represents the current state, with the relevant parts of meeting notes included in comments.
Actions
1. Meeting cadence
2. Video call platform
3. Collaborative documentation
4. Slack
5. GitHub
6. Sharing credentials
- For management of passwords etc.
- Other similar groups are using KeyBase - note this is no longer being updated.
Actions
7. Events registrations
- Previously using Luma
- This has been acceptable and continues to be free
- No indication of a requirement to move away from this.
- Review whether registration/attendance information is sufficient to track engagement (likely yes, in combination with zoom export)
Actions
Detail
The refreshed CMWG (initiated by the DARE UK 2025 award) should review and agree upon a core collaboration infrastructure.
This issue it to note the infrastructure to be reviewed, outcomes of relevant meeting conversations and decisions made going forwards. The below checklist represents the current state, with the relevant parts of meeting notes included in comments.
Actions
1. Meeting cadence
2. Video call platform
3. Collaborative documentation
MFT Sharepoint is used for confidential materials
Cryptdrive is used for internal working docs (code and office format with reviewing)
Legacy material on google drive - move over to cryptdrive
Transparency policy ([community review requested] UK TRE CMWG Transparency Policy #148 ) updated with storage conventions
Relevant discussion:
4. Slack
5. GitHub
6. Sharing credentials
Actions
7. Events registrations
Actions