Repository navigation
Replies: 2 comments
|
I like it, it's seems reasonable. What do you think @minox86 ? |
0 replies
|
I'd like it. Just a point of attention: is it better to define a "typetta abstraction" for directives or to simply add a reference to the GraphQL AST in the Schema? |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Although we already have the
@schema(metadata: [])decorator, it would nice if we could write our own decorators to make our gql schema less verbose. These decorators could be placed under the existing metadata field, or in it's own unique field.Ex.
GraphQL
Schema
All reactions