You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Close the first-value evidence loop with one explicit product decision grounded in the release, packaged first-use journey, and complete pilot evidence: retain the current design, isolate one first-use defect, or open a separate specification for a repeated preference gap.
Acceptance criteria
The decision cites every prior evidence frontier and its limitations.
The outcome is classified as exactly one of: retain current design, isolated first-use defect, or repeated preference gap.
Recommendation disagreement alone does not trigger routing, ranking, embedding, or model changes.
An isolated defect produces only a bounded follow-up specification or ticket; a repeated preference gap produces a separate policy specification; retaining the design closes the work without speculative features.
The conclusion states that token savings, labor savings, model quality, and universal Core-versus-On-demand superiority remain unproven.
The completion receipt distinguishes every ticket, validation gate, external effect, and remaining authority boundary.
Parent
#255
What to build
Close the first-value evidence loop with one explicit product decision grounded in the release, packaged first-use journey, and complete pilot evidence: retain the current design, isolate one first-use defect, or open a separate specification for a repeated preference gap.
Acceptance criteria
Blocked by