You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
At https://www.erdosproblems.com/forum/thread/AI%20Contributions#post-5735 Terry suggests that digestion be a requirement to mark a problem as "solved". While I think that this "digested" status is meaningful, I would like to propose that correct formalizations still be recorded. I see two options:
Allow a status like proved (Lean) (which is the normal status we've been using) to represent a formalized-but-undigested proof. I have submitted such a PR here: 469 -> proved (Lean) #345
Re-work the data representation in problems.yaml to separate the concepts of digested and formalized.
There are currently many proof claims on https://www.erdosproblems.com/ that are
At https://www.erdosproblems.com/forum/thread/AI%20Contributions#post-5735 Terry suggests that digestion be a requirement to mark a problem as "solved". While I think that this "digested" status is meaningful, I would like to propose that correct formalizations still be recorded. I see two options:
statuslikeproved (Lean)(which is the normal status we've been using) to represent a formalized-but-undigested proof. I have submitted such a PR here: 469 -> proved (Lean) #345problems.yamlto separate the concepts of digested and formalized.Thoughts?