Problem
Currently, users must run the BlueRiver Control Server (via IPA Manager) on a separate Windows machine to use this integration. This creates several limitations:
- External Dependency: Requires a Windows PC (Win10/Win11) to remain running 24/7
- Additional Hardware: Users need a separate machine beyond their Home Assistant server
- Setup Complexity: Multi-step setup process across different systems
- Network Requirements: The Windows PC must be on the same subnet as SDVoE devices
- Maintenance: Another system to maintain, update, and troubleshoot
Proposed Solution
Create a Home Assistant add-on that runs the BlueRiver Control Server process natively within Home Assistant, eliminating the need for external Windows hardware.
Benefits
✅ Self-Contained Solution
- 100% HA-based - no external dependencies
- Single system to manage and maintain
- Simplified architecture
✅ Easier Setup
- Install add-on from HA UI
- Configure port and settings
- Start integration - done!
✅ Better Integration
- Lifecycle tied to Home Assistant
- Auto-start on HA restart
- Unified logging and monitoring
✅ Cross-Platform Support
- Works on HA OS, Docker, Supervised installations
- No Windows requirement
- Broader hardware compatibility
✅ Cost Savings
- No need for dedicated Windows machine
- Reduced power consumption
- Lower hardware costs
Technical Considerations
Add-on Structure
# config.yaml
name: BlueRiver Control Server
version: 1.0.0
slug: blueriver_control
description: SDVoE API server for RiverLink integration
arch:
- aarch64
- amd64
- armv7
ports:
6970/tcp: 6970
options:
port: 6970
log_level: info
schema:
port: port
log_level: list(debug|info|warning|error)
Implementation Approaches
Option 1: Docker Container
- Package blueriver_control binary in Docker image
- Expose port 6970 for API access
- Configure via add-on options
Option 2: Python Reimplementation
- Reimplement SDVoE API server in Python
- Based on publicly documented SDVoE API specification
- Native Python integration with HA
Option 3: Wine/Compatibility Layer (if needed)
- Run Windows binary via Wine if no native option
- Less ideal but potentially workable
Configuration Options
- Port: Default 6970, user-configurable
- API Version: SDVoE API version to implement
- Log Level: Debug, Info, Warning, Error
- Auto-Discovery: Enable/disable device discovery
Integration with RiverLink
# Example configuration
riverlink:
host: core-blueriver-control # Add-on hostname
port: 6970
api_version: "2.13.0.0"
The integration would automatically detect the local add-on and configure itself accordingly.
Alternative Approaches
Document Linux Installation
If native Linux version of blueriver_control exists:
- Document installation on Linux systems
- Docker container for non-HA deployments
- Still better than Windows-only requirement
Community Server Implementation
If BlueRiver Control Server isn't redistributable:
- Community-developed SDVoE API server
- Based on public SDVoE API documentation
- Open-source alternative implementation
User Impact
Current Workflow:
- Set up Windows PC
- Download IPA Manager
- Install and configure IPA Manager
- Keep Windows PC running 24/7
- Install HA integration
- Configure to point to Windows PC
With Add-on:
- Install add-on from HA
- Start add-on
- Install integration (auto-configures to add-on)
- Done!
Success Criteria
Priority
🟡 Medium-High
While the current Windows-based solution works, an add-on would significantly improve user experience and adoption.
Related Documentation
Next Steps
- Research technical feasibility of each implementation approach
- Determine if blueriver_control binary can be redistributed
- Investigate creating reference implementation from SDVoE API docs
- Create add-on proof-of-concept
- Test with real SDVoE hardware
- Documentation and release
Problem
Currently, users must run the BlueRiver Control Server (via IPA Manager) on a separate Windows machine to use this integration. This creates several limitations:
Proposed Solution
Create a Home Assistant add-on that runs the BlueRiver Control Server process natively within Home Assistant, eliminating the need for external Windows hardware.
Benefits
✅ Self-Contained Solution
✅ Easier Setup
✅ Better Integration
✅ Cross-Platform Support
✅ Cost Savings
Technical Considerations
Add-on Structure
Implementation Approaches
Option 1: Docker Container
Option 2: Python Reimplementation
Option 3: Wine/Compatibility Layer (if needed)
Configuration Options
Integration with RiverLink
The integration would automatically detect the local add-on and configure itself accordingly.
Alternative Approaches
Document Linux Installation
If native Linux version of blueriver_control exists:
Community Server Implementation
If BlueRiver Control Server isn't redistributable:
User Impact
Current Workflow:
With Add-on:
Success Criteria
Priority
🟡 Medium-High
While the current Windows-based solution works, an add-on would significantly improve user experience and adoption.
Related Documentation
Next Steps