Companion issue to the 2026-07-28 report filed separately (results differ per revision, so filing individually rather than merging). When ctx-mcp-server is tested against the 2025-11-25 revision, the one concrete violation is that the server always negotiates down to 2024-11-05 at handshake regardless of what the client offers, even though it also advertises 2025-11-25 and 2026-07-28 support. That mismatch then makes 13 further checks unverifiable, since the suite can't test 2025-11-25-specific behavior against a session that settled on 2024-11-05.
Conformance report
MCP 2025-11-25 conformance report
Verdict: not conformant — 1 requirement violated.
|
|
| Target |
uvx --from claude-ctx ctx-mcp-server |
| Transport |
stdio |
| Revision tested |
2025-11-25 |
| Revisions supported |
2026-07-28, 2025-11-25 |
| Passed |
6 |
| Failed |
1 |
| Not verified |
13 |
| Cases applied |
20 |
| Tool |
@hasmcp/mcp-spec-test 0.1.1 |
Failed (1)
the server deviates from the spec here
Official SDK interop
- the handshake settles on a revision inside the supported window
a client offering 2025-11-25 was answered with 2024-11-05, outside the supported window (2026-07-28, 2025-11-25)
Not verified (13)
skipped; a skip is not a pass — all because the negotiated protocol version (2024-11-05) doesn't match the revision under test.
Capability methods
- tools/list returns schema-conformant tools
- tools/call on an unknown tool is an error, not a crash
- tools/call returns a schema-conformant CallToolResult
- prompts/list returns schema-conformant prompts
- prompts/get returns messages with a role and content
- resources/list returns schema-conformant resources
- resources/templates/list returns schema-conformant templates
- resources/read returns contents for every sampled resource
- resources/read on an unknown uri is an error
- following nextCursor terminates and does not repeat a page
- an invalid pagination cursor is rejected (SHOULD)
Version negotiation
- initialize returns the schema-required fields
- the handshake settles on the revision under test
Passed (6)
checked and conformant
server/discover
- the suite is reading a schema that matches the features it selected
Version negotiation
- a request with no version at all is served on the default
- an unsupported version offered at the handshake is refused or downgraded, not echoed
Official SDK interop
- the official SDK does not yet implement the newest revision
- a stock official-SDK client completes the handshake
- a stock official-SDK client can list tools
How to reproduce
With Docker:
docker pull hasmcp/mcp-spec-test:latest
docker run --rm hasmcp/mcp-spec-test -c "uvx --from claude-ctx ctx-mcp-server" --spec-version 2025-11-25
Without Docker (npx):
npx @hasmcp/mcp-spec-test@latest -c "uvx --from claude-ctx ctx-mcp-server" --spec-version 2025-11-25
This issue was filed as part of an automated MCP spec conformance sweep across public MCP server repos. If this doesn't apply, please feel free to close it.
Companion issue to the 2026-07-28 report filed separately (results differ per revision, so filing individually rather than merging). When
ctx-mcp-serveris tested against the 2025-11-25 revision, the one concrete violation is that the server always negotiates down to2024-11-05at handshake regardless of what the client offers, even though it also advertises2025-11-25and2026-07-28support. That mismatch then makes 13 further checks unverifiable, since the suite can't test 2025-11-25-specific behavior against a session that settled on 2024-11-05.Conformance report
MCP 2025-11-25 conformance report
Verdict: not conformant — 1 requirement violated.
uvx --from claude-ctx ctx-mcp-serverFailed (1)
the server deviates from the spec here
Official SDK interop
a client offering 2025-11-25 was answered with 2024-11-05, outside the supported window (2026-07-28, 2025-11-25)
Not verified (13)
skipped; a skip is not a pass — all because the negotiated protocol version (2024-11-05) doesn't match the revision under test.
Capability methods
Version negotiation
Passed (6)
checked and conformant
server/discover
Version negotiation
Official SDK interop
How to reproduce
With Docker:
Without Docker (npx):
This issue was filed as part of an automated MCP spec conformance sweep across public MCP server repos. If this doesn't apply, please feel free to close it.