Problem
Users should be able to manage common apps out of the box, while advanced users should be able to add support for apps that are not in the official set. That requires a clear recipe catalog/tap model instead of only local ad-hoc recipes.
Scope
Design and implement recipe catalog support.
Required model
- The dotfiles-manager official catalog is preconfigured by default, but normal user output must not present it as baked into or included with the app.
- The official catalog can later be updated from its remote origin, and additional remote catalogs can be added, listed, updated, disabled, and removed.
- Catalogs are similar in spirit to Homebrew taps: a named source that provides recipes.
- Recipe origin is visible so users know whether a recipe is official or from another catalog.
- The trust/update story is explicit before recipes from remote sources can write app settings.
Acceptance criteria
#219 audit follow-up: split sequence
Source: #219 audit merged in #220 (docs/internal/project/v2-reset-audit-issue-219.md).
This issue is now a parent delivery area. Use these split issues:
Additional gate:
Project Execution Standards alignment
Latest standard read for this update: /Users/shpoont/Work/shpoont/project-execution-standards/project-execution-standard.md, last-updated 2026-06-29.
Project record / source of truth: #209 plus docs/internal/project/v2-reset-execution-record.md; this issue is the catalog parent.
Role of this issue: parent delivery area for catalog work, not a direct implementation package.
Risk tier: parent mixed Tier 1/Tier 2. #228 official-catalog discovery is Tier 1 because it is public CLI UX but read-only. #229 catalog update/remote catalog management is Tier 2 because it introduces remote origin, trust, update/cache, and write-authority risk.
Current child sequence:
Design/documentation-first rule:
- Any meaningful catalog CLI surface must have runnable/replayable UX evidence or an owner-recorded waiver before implementation.
- User-facing docs/examples for catalogs must explain that catalogs define app/tool support and do not store user settings.
Change rule:
- Changes to the child sequence, remote trust/write-authority model, catalog lifecycle scope, or official-catalog user wording are managed changes requiring Project Owner decision.
No-go actions:
Acceptance rule / closure rule:
Problem
Users should be able to manage common apps out of the box, while advanced users should be able to add support for apps that are not in the official set. That requires a clear recipe catalog/tap model instead of only local ad-hoc recipes.
Scope
Design and implement recipe catalog support.
Required model
Acceptance criteria
#219 audit follow-up: split sequence
Source: #219 audit merged in #220 (
docs/internal/project/v2-reset-audit-issue-219.md).This issue is now a parent delivery area. Use these split issues:
Additional gate:
Project Execution Standards alignment
Latest standard read for this update:
/Users/shpoont/Work/shpoont/project-execution-standards/project-execution-standard.md, last-updated 2026-06-29.Project record / source of truth: #209 plus
docs/internal/project/v2-reset-execution-record.md; this issue is the catalog parent.Role of this issue: parent delivery area for catalog work, not a direct implementation package.
Risk tier: parent mixed Tier 1/Tier 2. #228 official-catalog discovery is Tier 1 because it is public CLI UX but read-only. #229 catalog update/remote catalog management is Tier 2 because it introduces remote origin, trust, update/cache, and write-authority risk.
Current child sequence:
Design/documentation-first rule:
Change rule:
No-go actions:
Acceptance rule / closure rule:
docs/internal/project/v2-reset-execution-record.md.