Individual should show that they were key contributor and example to team. This includes their participation in ideas, plans, creating individual issues, providing code commits to project, crossover grading participation, being on task and positive example in the classroom.
Individuals Video, Issue(s), Commits(s)
[0.9] Video in CPT caption style , includes Web demo of key contribution to project, 1 minute
[0.74] Issue(s) that show plans/progress to team objectives
[0.9] Highlights of key commit(s) in Issues, summarizes code contributions
[0.89] Review GitHub analytics for key commits in each weeks during the project, shows consistent participation for 3 weeks
Per check.
0.55 not attempted/no check
0.7 attempted, incomplete, but some runtime
0.8 mastery and runtime
0.9 above and beyond.
Freeform comment.
Nice Features
Nice documentation of work
Need improvement on
Score: (0.9+0.74+0.9+0.9)/4 = 0.8575 out of 0.9
Individual should show that they were key contributor and example to team. This includes their participation in ideas, plans, creating individual issues, providing code commits to project, crossover grading participation, being on task and positive example in the classroom.
Individuals Video, Issue(s), Commits(s)
[0.9] Video in CPT caption style , includes Web demo of key contribution to project, 1 minute
[0.74] Issue(s) that show plans/progress to team objectives
[0.9] Highlights of key commit(s) in Issues, summarizes code contributions
[0.89] Review GitHub analytics for key commits in each weeks during the project, shows consistent participation for 3 weeks
Per check.
0.55 not attempted/no check
0.7 attempted, incomplete, but some runtime
0.8 mastery and runtime
0.9 above and beyond.
Freeform comment.
Nice Features
Nice documentation of work
Need improvement on
Score: (0.9+0.74+0.9+0.9)/4 = 0.8575 out of 0.9