The documentation comments of the three try_reserve_exact methods stabilized today in 1.57.0 (in Vec, String, and VecDeque) all have the same note as the corresponding aborting method reserve_exact:
Prefer reserve if future insertions are expected.
For the fallible try_reserve_exact methods, should that say try_reserve rather than reserve?
The documentation comments of the three
try_reserve_exactmethods stabilized today in 1.57.0 (inVec,String, andVecDeque) all have the same note as the corresponding aborting methodreserve_exact:For the fallible
try_reserve_exactmethods, should that saytry_reserverather thanreserve?