Now that the COP21 has finished, I think there is still a very interesting way to extract (democratic) value from the huge work that you've done on the negotiating text.
My impression (and not just mine unfortunately) is that the final text of the agreement retains systematically the weakest of all the previous options (with the notable exception of the 1.5°).
This is something that a well done diff could show.
@rgrp is there a way you can publish an early version of the draft (ideally that of the one with which they enter the negotiation, but if it is too different, the version of the 5 December will do) and highlight on it the option that have been retained in the final text?
Should my impression be right, we could then communicate a bit around it.
Now that the COP21 has finished, I think there is still a very interesting way to extract (democratic) value from the huge work that you've done on the negotiating text.
My impression (and not just mine unfortunately) is that the final text of the agreement retains systematically the weakest of all the previous options (with the notable exception of the 1.5°).
This is something that a well done diff could show.
@rgrp is there a way you can publish an early version of the draft (ideally that of the one with which they enter the negotiation, but if it is too different, the version of the 5 December will do) and highlight on it the option that have been retained in the final text?
Should my impression be right, we could then communicate a bit around it.