I ran into this while checking the current next branch (c6cfc6b).
The repository-level license is Apache-2.0, but the SDK package metadata points to GPL-3.0:
LICENSE is Apache License 2.0.
- GitHub reports the repository license as Apache-2.0.
packages/rango-sdk/package.json, packages/rango-sdk-basic/package.json, and packages/rango-types/package.json use "license": "GPL-3.0".
- The README license badges display GPLv3.
- The published npm metadata for
rango-sdk and rango-sdk-basic reports GPL-3.0.
Could you confirm which license should be treated as canonical for the SDK packages? After that, I can send a small PR to align the README/package metadata or the root license file.
Commands I used:
head -20 LICENSE
rg -n "GPL|Apache|License|license" README.md package.json packages/*/package.json
npm view rango-sdk version license repository.url
npm view rango-sdk-basic version license repository.url
I also checked for existing issues and PRs with:
gh search issues 'license Apache GPL README' -R rango-exchange/rango-sdk --state open
gh search issues 'license Apache GPL README' -R rango-exchange/rango-sdk --state closed
gh search prs 'license Apache GPL README' -R rango-exchange/rango-sdk --state open
gh search prs 'license Apache GPL README' -R rango-exchange/rango-sdk --state closed
Those searches returned no results.
I ran into this while checking the current
nextbranch (c6cfc6b).The repository-level license is Apache-2.0, but the SDK package metadata points to GPL-3.0:
LICENSEis Apache License 2.0.packages/rango-sdk/package.json,packages/rango-sdk-basic/package.json, andpackages/rango-types/package.jsonuse"license": "GPL-3.0".rango-sdkandrango-sdk-basicreports GPL-3.0.Could you confirm which license should be treated as canonical for the SDK packages? After that, I can send a small PR to align the README/package metadata or the root license file.
Commands I used:
I also checked for existing issues and PRs with:
Those searches returned no results.