Namespace for third party extensions and applications

[hertsch]

As discussed the actual namespace for third party extension thirdParty may be not ideal.
Suggestion: What's about Vendor as namespace for extensions which are not distributed by the phpManufaktur?

[trebitzki]

I would also be more comfortable with 'Vendor'.

A more general question about namespaces: What is the reason for duplicate subfolders like
thirdparty/thirdParty (see screenshot)? Unless this is really neccessary I would suggest removing the double folders. Also I don't understand why 'framework' appears all over the place; perhaps we could be more specific in naming like 'kitframework' or whatever the meaning of the folder is.

[hertsch]

The duplicate subfolders are a composer feature - please don't ask me why, so we must do it in the same manner ... 8-/

The framework folder contains the Silex files, so an alternate will be 'Silex'. But: I'm absolutely shure that we will extend the 'framework' with additional libraries. For example: I' shure we will need a powerfull REST service.

So, I've thought framework tells something about the content but stay neutral.