Repository navigation
Replies: 2 comments 4 replies
|
@gertsevv, I see that you also changed the phase from -1 to 1, correct? |
4 replies
|
That's correct, so the no float model will have one additional parameter
compared to your previous model.
…On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 1:01 PM Claire Rosemond ***@***.***> wrote:
@gertsevv <https://github.com/gertsevv>, I see that you also changed the
phase from -1 to 1, correct?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#90 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB4T76RYACLPK5PDEZXOOET2755AZAVCNFSM6AAAAAB5ZPUSGGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43URDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHMYTGMRVGA3DIOA>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID:
<pfmc-assessments/Assessment_Class/repo-discussions/90/comments/13250648@
github.com>
--
*Aaron M. Berger, Ph.D.*
*Research Mathematical Statistician*
*[Courtesy Faculty, Oregon State University]*
*Northwest Fisheries Science Center*
*NOAA-Fisheries | U.S. Department of Commerce*
*(541) 231-1417*
***@***.*** ***@***.***>*
|
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Following today's discussion on how to fit index for fleet 6 better, I ran several model runs.
Block for fleet 6 catchability is updated from 2004 forward (instead of 2005 forward)
Block is updated plus float option for fleet 6 is set =0 (no float option)
The fit to fleet 6 index is much improved in no float run. The model outputs are similar for all models, but the run with no float option bringing stock a little closer to 40% target. See figures below.
I am attaching control files I used for both runs.
yelloweye_control_block_updated.ss.txt
yelloweye_control_block_updated_nofloat.ss.txt
All reactions