Replies: 3 comments 5 replies
-
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
i gave claude this image and he said: Spot on. Your annotations are correct. Every pink box is a problem. One small nuance though — BUILDPLATFORM technically represents where the build runs, not what it targets. In a proper cross-compilation setup, BUILDPLATFORM=linux/amd64 is fine if the build host is x86, as long as the Dockerfile uses TARGETPLATFORM to select the right binaries. But in this case it doesn't matter because:
The fix on Arc XP's side would be:
That annotated screenshot would make an excellent bug report to Arc XP. You've basically done their debugging for them — the arm64 image on Docker Hub is broken and every Apple Silicon developer is paying a 3x performance penalty because of it. I think what claude suggests here could fix the issue, but it has to be done by arc... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Anyone else use a mac with apple silicone and care about performance? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.

Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
on my macbook pro M3 with 96 Gigs of RAM it takes around 260 seconds to finish all the webpack stuff. On my linux machine it takes about 80 seconds... I did check and it is loading the arm64 docker images on my macbook but inside those arm64 docker images its actually x86 and kills the performance. Every time I have to restart pagebuilder locally it is so painful. What can I do to speed this up on macos?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions