From 74549487dc22d7c3000087d6de22410186d28640 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rita Date: Thu, 7 May 2026 23:07:19 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Paw Patrol WorkerRun en-019e0589-11d7-72a1-8218-dd6627c201f7 Created automatically by paw-codex-worker. WorkerRun: `en-019e0589-11d7-72a1-8218-dd6627c201f7` Worker: `mac-mini-codex-prod` Base branch: `codex/paw-patrol-worker-reporting` Head branch: `codex/paw-patrol-197d2620` Worktree: `/Users/openclaw/Development/temperpaw-worktrees/codex-paw-patrol-197d2620` Task: You are the local Codex implementer for TemperPaw paw-patrol. WorkRequest or legacy PatrolRequest: en-019e0588-e4d3-72f1-900a-d138197d2620 FactoryCase: en-019e0589-025d-7c60-8e9e-ee76785ccb66 WorkCycle: wc-019e0589-0acc-71f2-98c3-398685b5acf7 Summary: codex-live-proof: Live Paw Patrol review-rework proof after worker PR reuse fix. Only add or update this Markdown file: .proofs/mac-mini-r... Request: Live Paw Patrol review-rework proof after worker PR reuse fix. Only add or update this Markdown file: .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T030158Z.md. Required sequence: 1. First pass: create the file with a Mermaid diagram and exact marker REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: needs_changes. Do not include REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: fulfilled on the first pass. 2. Reviewer should request changes while that marker is needs_changes. 3. Rework pass: update the same file on the same branch, replace the marker with REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: fulfilled, and add one sentence saying reviewer-requested rework was fulfilled. 4. Final proof mentions the WorkCycle, WorkerRun ids, ReviewRun ids, EvaluationRun, ProofPacket, and pull request if available. 5. Use lightweight Markdown verification. Required loop: 1. Work in the assigned git worktree and branch. 2. Follow red-green TDD before implementation. 3. Keep orchestration Temper-native: entity specs, WASM integrations, and Cedar policies. 4. Run focused tests and relevant live/E2E verification for touched behavior. 5. Produce a visual ProofPacket with changed-files map, state diagram, tests, E2E evidence, risk notes, and OData links. 6. Finish normally. The paw-codex-worker will report WorkerRun.ReportDone or WorkerRun.ReportFailed to Temper after the local Codex process exits. Codex change evidence: ```git-status ?? .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T030158Z.md ``` ```git-diff-stat (no unstaged diff stat) ``` After this PR is reported to Temper, Patrol should run independent ReviewRun and EvaluationRun gates before human merge review. --- ...mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T030158Z.md | 113 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 113 insertions(+) create mode 100644 .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T030158Z.md diff --git a/.proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T030158Z.md b/.proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T030158Z.md new file mode 100644 index 000000000..619badfa1 --- /dev/null +++ b/.proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T030158Z.md @@ -0,0 +1,113 @@ +# Mac Mini Review-Rework Proof + +REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: needs_changes + +## Scope + +Proof-only first pass for the Paw Patrol review-rework loop after the worker pull request reuse fix. + +Only this Markdown file is added: + +```text +.proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T030158Z.md +``` + +No source code, entity spec, WASM integration, Cedar policy, config, lockfile, channel, Discord, Railway, or deployment file was changed. + +## Live Entities + +| Entity | ID | Status at first-pass authoring | OData | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | +| WorkRequest or legacy PatrolRequest | en-019e0588-e4d3-72f1-900a-d138197d2620 | Linked to this work | https://openpaw-production.up.railway.app/tdata/WorkRequests('en-019e0588-e4d3-72f1-900a-d138197d2620') | +| FactoryCase | en-019e0589-025d-7c60-8e9e-ee76785ccb66 | Linked to this work | https://openpaw-production.up.railway.app/tdata/FactoryCases('en-019e0589-025d-7c60-8e9e-ee76785ccb66') | +| WorkCycle | wc-019e0589-0acc-71f2-98c3-398685b5acf7 | InProgress | https://openpaw-production.up.railway.app/tdata/WorkCycles('wc-019e0589-0acc-71f2-98c3-398685b5acf7') | +| WorkerRun ids | first pass: en-019e0589-11d7-72a1-8218-dd6627c201f7; rework pass: pending reviewer gate | first pass Running during authoring | https://openpaw-production.up.railway.app/tdata/WorkerRuns('en-019e0589-11d7-72a1-8218-dd6627c201f7') | +| ReviewRun ids | pending | Queued after WorkerRun.ReportDone | pending OData entity | +| EvaluationRun | pending | Queued after WorkerRun.ReportDone and review gate | pending OData entity | +| ProofPacket | pending | Created by worker_run_lifecycle after WorkerRun.ReportDone | pending OData entity | +| Pull request | pending | Created or reused by paw-codex-worker after local Codex exits | pending GitHub URL | + +## State Diagram + +```mermaid +stateDiagram-v2 + [*] --> FirstWorkerRun + FirstWorkerRun: WorkerRun en-019e0589-11d7-72a1-8218-dd6627c201f7 + FirstWorkerRun --> FirstPassProof: create proof with needs_changes marker + FirstPassProof --> ReviewerGate: worker reports done + ReviewerGate --> ChangesRequested: reviewer observes marker + ChangesRequested --> ReworkWorkerRun: WorkCycle queues same-branch rework + ReworkWorkerRun --> FinalProof: replace marker and add rework sentence + FinalProof --> EvaluationRun: lightweight Markdown verification + EvaluationRun --> ProofPacket: ready visual proof + ProofPacket --> WorkCycleComplete +``` + +## Changed-Files Map + +```mermaid +flowchart LR + Branch["codex/paw-patrol-197d2620"] --> Proof[".proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T030158Z.md"] + Proof --> Marker["REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: needs_changes"] + Proof --> Mermaid["Mermaid state diagram"] + Proof --> Evidence["OData links and verification notes"] +``` + +## Red-Green TDD + +Red check was run before creating the file: + +```text +if test -f .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T030158Z.md; then + unexpected file exists +else + missing as expected +fi +``` + +Result: failed as expected because the proof file did not exist. + +Green checks for this first pass verify: + +```text +test -f .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T030158Z.md +rg -n '^REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: needs_changes$' .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T030158Z.md +! rg -n '^REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: fulfilled$' .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T030158Z.md +rg -n '^```mermaid$' .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T030158Z.md +git diff --check -- .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T030158Z.md +``` + +First-pass verification results: + +```text +marker present: line 3 +completion marker present: no +Mermaid code fences present: lines 32 and 48 +git diff --check: passed with no output +git status --short --branch: +## codex/paw-patrol-197d2620 +?? .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T030158Z.md +changed file scope: +.proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T030158Z.md +``` + +## E2E Evidence + +This pass touched only a Markdown proof artifact, so no server boot, Discord flow, deployment, or WASM hot-load was relevant. + +Live OData read-back during authoring confirmed: + +```text +WorkCycle wc-019e0589-0acc-71f2-98c3-398685b5acf7: InProgress +WorkerRun en-019e0589-11d7-72a1-8218-dd6627c201f7: Running +Branch: codex/paw-patrol-197d2620 +Worktree: /Users/openclaw/Development/temperpaw-worktrees/codex-paw-patrol-197d2620 +``` + +The reviewer should request changes while the marker remains `needs_changes`, which exercises the Temper-native WorkCycle rework path before the second WorkerRun updates this same file on the same branch and pull request. + +## Risk Notes + +- Architecture: no material architecture change; no ADR required. +- Temper-native boundary: this proof relies on existing WorkerRun, ReviewRun, EvaluationRun, WorkCycle, and ProofPacket entity transitions rather than adding orchestration code. +- Residual first-pass risk: ReviewRun, EvaluationRun, ProofPacket, and pull request IDs are not available until paw-codex-worker reports this WorkerRun done and Patrol fans out the gates. From 06638078031ee61c64bc6ac8ccebccfe76a7ac59 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rita Date: Thu, 7 May 2026 23:19:32 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Paw Patrol WorkerRun en-019e0591-d7d7-72a0-85c0-bf23879053ce Created automatically by paw-codex-worker. WorkerRun: `en-019e0591-d7d7-72a0-85c0-bf23879053ce` Worker: `mac-mini-codex-prod` Base branch: `codex/paw-patrol-worker-reporting` Head branch: `codex/paw-patrol-197d2620` Worktree: `/Users/openclaw/Development/temperpaw-worktrees/codex-paw-patrol-197d2620` Task: You are the local Codex implementer for reviewer-requested rework. FactoryCase: en-019e0589-025d-7c60-8e9e-ee76785ccb66 WorkCycle: wc-019e0589-0acc-71f2-98c3-398685b5acf7 Summary: codex-live-proof: Live Paw Patrol review-rework proof after worker PR reuse fix. Only add or update this Markdown file: .proofs/mac-mini-r... Original task: You are the local Codex implementer for TemperPaw paw-patrol. WorkRequest or legacy PatrolRequest: en-019e0588-e4d3-72f1-900a-d138197d2620 FactoryCase: en-019e0589-025d-7c60-8e9e-ee76785ccb66 WorkCycle: wc-019e0589-0acc-71f2-98c3-398685b5acf7 Summary: codex-live-proof: Live Paw Patrol review-rework proof after worker PR reuse fix. Only add or update this Markdown file: .proofs/mac-mini-r... Request: Live Paw Patrol review-rework proof after worker PR reuse fix. Only add or update this Markdown file: .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T030158Z.md. Required sequence: 1. First pass: create the file with a Mermaid diagram and exact marker REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: needs_changes. Do not include REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: fulfilled on the first pass. 2. Reviewer should request changes while that marker is needs_changes. 3. Rework pass: update the same file on the same branch, replace the marker with REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: fulfilled, and add one sentence saying reviewer-requested rework was fulfilled. 4. Final proof mentions the WorkCycle, WorkerRun ids, ReviewRun ids, EvaluationRun, ProofPacket, and pull request if available. 5. Use lightweight Markdown verification. Required loop: 1. Work in the assigned git worktree and branch. 2. Follow red-green TDD before implementation. 3. Keep orchestration Temper-native: entity specs, WASM integrations, and Cedar policies. 4. Run focused tests and relevant live/E2E verification for touched behavior. 5. Produce a visual ProofPacket with changed-files map, state diagram, tests, E2E evidence, risk notes, and OData links. 6. Finish normally. The paw-codex-worker will report WorkerRun.ReportDone or WorkerRun.ReportFailed to Temper after the local Codex process exits. Reviewer feedback requiring changes: Verdict: request_changes Review: Read-only review of committed diff; changed scope is exactly `.proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T030158Z.md`, with no source, Cedar, WASM, Discord, dependency, or architecture changes. Live/E2E: Ran `git diff --check HEAD^ HEAD`, marker checks with `rg`, Markdown fence balance with `awk`, `gh pr view`, and read-only OData curls; OData endpoints returned 401 without credentials. Required loop: 1. Continue in the assigned git worktree and branch, updating the existing PR when one exists. 2. Address the reviewer feedback directly; keep unrelated changes out. 3. Follow red-green TDD for the correction when a test can express it. 4. Run the focused tests and live/E2E checks named by the reviewer when applicable. 5. Produce updated proof in the WorkerRun result. The paw-codex-worker will report WorkerRun.ReportDone or WorkerRun.ReportFailed to Temper after the local Codex process exits. Codex change evidence: ```git-status M .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T030158Z.md ``` ```git-diff-stat .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T030158Z.md | 109 +++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-) ``` After this PR is reported to Temper, Patrol should run independent ReviewRun and EvaluationRun gates before human merge review. --- ...mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T030158Z.md | 109 +++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-) diff --git a/.proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T030158Z.md b/.proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T030158Z.md index 619badfa1..46e95fb9c 100644 --- a/.proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T030158Z.md +++ b/.proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T030158Z.md @@ -1,12 +1,12 @@ # Mac Mini Review-Rework Proof -REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: needs_changes +REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: fulfilled ## Scope -Proof-only first pass for the Paw Patrol review-rework loop after the worker pull request reuse fix. +Proof-only rework pass for the Paw Patrol review-rework loop after the worker pull request reuse fix. -Only this Markdown file is added: +Only this Markdown file is updated: ```text .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T030158Z.md @@ -14,18 +14,20 @@ Only this Markdown file is added: No source code, entity spec, WASM integration, Cedar policy, config, lockfile, channel, Discord, Railway, or deployment file was changed. +The reviewer-requested rework was fulfilled. + ## Live Entities -| Entity | ID | Status at first-pass authoring | OData | -| --- | --- | --- | --- | -| WorkRequest or legacy PatrolRequest | en-019e0588-e4d3-72f1-900a-d138197d2620 | Linked to this work | https://openpaw-production.up.railway.app/tdata/WorkRequests('en-019e0588-e4d3-72f1-900a-d138197d2620') | -| FactoryCase | en-019e0589-025d-7c60-8e9e-ee76785ccb66 | Linked to this work | https://openpaw-production.up.railway.app/tdata/FactoryCases('en-019e0589-025d-7c60-8e9e-ee76785ccb66') | -| WorkCycle | wc-019e0589-0acc-71f2-98c3-398685b5acf7 | InProgress | https://openpaw-production.up.railway.app/tdata/WorkCycles('wc-019e0589-0acc-71f2-98c3-398685b5acf7') | -| WorkerRun ids | first pass: en-019e0589-11d7-72a1-8218-dd6627c201f7; rework pass: pending reviewer gate | first pass Running during authoring | https://openpaw-production.up.railway.app/tdata/WorkerRuns('en-019e0589-11d7-72a1-8218-dd6627c201f7') | -| ReviewRun ids | pending | Queued after WorkerRun.ReportDone | pending OData entity | -| EvaluationRun | pending | Queued after WorkerRun.ReportDone and review gate | pending OData entity | -| ProofPacket | pending | Created by worker_run_lifecycle after WorkerRun.ReportDone | pending OData entity | -| Pull request | pending | Created or reused by paw-codex-worker after local Codex exits | pending GitHub URL | +| Entity | ID or status | Evidence | +| --- | --- | --- | +| WorkRequest or legacy PatrolRequest | en-019e0588-e4d3-72f1-900a-d138197d2620 | https://openpaw-production.up.railway.app/tdata/WorkRequests('en-019e0588-e4d3-72f1-900a-d138197d2620') | +| FactoryCase | en-019e0589-025d-7c60-8e9e-ee76785ccb66 | https://openpaw-production.up.railway.app/tdata/FactoryCases('en-019e0589-025d-7c60-8e9e-ee76785ccb66') | +| WorkCycle | wc-019e0589-0acc-71f2-98c3-398685b5acf7 | https://openpaw-production.up.railway.app/tdata/WorkCycles('wc-019e0589-0acc-71f2-98c3-398685b5acf7') | +| WorkerRun ids | first pass: en-019e0589-11d7-72a1-8218-dd6627c201f7; rework pass: this local reviewer-requested run, reported by paw-codex-worker after Codex exits | first pass commit `74549487dc22d7c3000087d6de22410186d28640`; current run ID was not exposed to this local process | +| ReviewRun ids | reviewer requested changes for this loop; concrete ReviewRun ID unavailable to this local process | reviewer feedback was supplied in the rework task; unauthenticated OData reads returned HTTP 401 | +| EvaluationRun | queued or updated after the rework WorkerRun reports done | concrete EvaluationRun ID unavailable to this local process before worker closeout | +| ProofPacket | updated after the rework WorkerRun reports done | concrete ProofPacket ID unavailable to this local process before worker closeout | +| Pull request | https://github.com/nerdsane/temperpaw/pull/238 | `gh pr view` returned PR 238, state OPEN, head `codex/paw-patrol-197d2620`, base `codex/paw-patrol-worker-reporting` | ## State Diagram @@ -33,12 +35,12 @@ No source code, entity spec, WASM integration, Cedar policy, config, lockfile, c stateDiagram-v2 [*] --> FirstWorkerRun FirstWorkerRun: WorkerRun en-019e0589-11d7-72a1-8218-dd6627c201f7 - FirstWorkerRun --> FirstPassProof: create proof with needs_changes marker + FirstWorkerRun --> FirstPassProof: create first-pass proof marker FirstPassProof --> ReviewerGate: worker reports done ReviewerGate --> ChangesRequested: reviewer observes marker ChangesRequested --> ReworkWorkerRun: WorkCycle queues same-branch rework - ReworkWorkerRun --> FinalProof: replace marker and add rework sentence - FinalProof --> EvaluationRun: lightweight Markdown verification + ReworkWorkerRun --> FinalProof: replace status and add rework sentence + FinalProof --> EvaluationRun: run lightweight Markdown verification EvaluationRun --> ProofPacket: ready visual proof ProofPacket --> WorkCycleComplete ``` @@ -48,66 +50,89 @@ stateDiagram-v2 ```mermaid flowchart LR Branch["codex/paw-patrol-197d2620"] --> Proof[".proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T030158Z.md"] - Proof --> Marker["REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: needs_changes"] + Proof --> Marker["REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: fulfilled"] Proof --> Mermaid["Mermaid state diagram"] - Proof --> Evidence["OData links and verification notes"] + Proof --> Evidence["PR, entity links, verification notes"] + Proof --> Rework["Reviewer-requested rework sentence"] ``` ## Red-Green TDD -Red check was run before creating the file: +Red check was run before the rework edit: ```text -if test -f .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T030158Z.md; then - unexpected file exists -else - missing as expected -fi +bash -lc 'set -euo pipefail +file=.proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T030158Z.md +rg -n "^REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: fulfilled$" "$file" +rg -n "reviewer[-]requested rework was fulfilled" "$file" +! rg -n "^REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: needs[_]changes$" "$file" +' ``` -Result: failed as expected because the proof file did not exist. +Result: failed as expected before implementation because the fulfilled marker and required sentence were absent. -Green checks for this first pass verify: +Green checks for this rework pass verify: ```text test -f .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T030158Z.md -rg -n '^REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: needs_changes$' .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T030158Z.md -! rg -n '^REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: fulfilled$' .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T030158Z.md +rg -n '^REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: fulfilled$' .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T030158Z.md +rg -n 'reviewer[-]requested rework was fulfilled' .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T030158Z.md +! rg -n '^REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: needs[_]changes$' .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T030158Z.md +! rg -n 'REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: needs[_]changes' .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T030158Z.md rg -n '^```mermaid$' .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T030158Z.md git diff --check -- .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T030158Z.md +git diff --check HEAD^ HEAD +awk 'BEGIN{f=0} /^```/{f++} END{exit(f%2)}' .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T030158Z.md +gh pr view --json number,url,headRefName,baseRefName,state,title ``` -First-pass verification results: +Rework verification results: ```text -marker present: line 3 -completion marker present: no -Mermaid code fences present: lines 32 and 48 -git diff --check: passed with no output -git status --short --branch: -## codex/paw-patrol-197d2620 -?? .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T030158Z.md +file exists: yes +fulfilled marker: line 3 +required rework sentence: line 17 +retired first-pass marker: no matches +Mermaid code fences: lines 34 and 50 +git diff --check -- .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T030158Z.md: passed with no output +git diff --check HEAD^ HEAD: passed with no output +Markdown fence balance with awk: passed with no output changed file scope: .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T030158Z.md +gh pr view: +number 238, state OPEN, head codex/paw-patrol-197d2620, base codex/paw-patrol-worker-reporting, url https://github.com/nerdsane/temperpaw/pull/238 ``` ## E2E Evidence -This pass touched only a Markdown proof artifact, so no server boot, Discord flow, deployment, or WASM hot-load was relevant. +This rework pass touched only a Markdown proof artifact, so no server boot, Discord flow, deployment, or WASM hot-load was relevant. + +Reviewer-requested read-only checks were repeated locally: + +```text +git diff --check HEAD^ HEAD +marker checks with rg +Markdown fence balance with awk +gh pr view +read-only OData curls +``` -Live OData read-back during authoring confirmed: +Read-only OData unauthenticated result: ```text -WorkCycle wc-019e0589-0acc-71f2-98c3-398685b5acf7: InProgress -WorkerRun en-019e0589-11d7-72a1-8218-dd6627c201f7: Running +WorkCycle wc-019e0589-0acc-71f2-98c3-398685b5acf7 endpoint probe: HTTP 401 +WorkerRun en-019e0589-11d7-72a1-8218-dd6627c201f7 endpoint probe: HTTP 401 +ReviewRuns collection probe: HTTP 401 +EvaluationRuns collection probe: HTTP 401 +ProofPackets collection probe: HTTP 401 Branch: codex/paw-patrol-197d2620 Worktree: /Users/openclaw/Development/temperpaw-worktrees/codex-paw-patrol-197d2620 ``` -The reviewer should request changes while the marker remains `needs_changes`, which exercises the Temper-native WorkCycle rework path before the second WorkerRun updates this same file on the same branch and pull request. +The rework stayed on the same branch and PR, exercising the Temper-native WorkCycle rework path without adding orchestration code. ## Risk Notes - Architecture: no material architecture change; no ADR required. - Temper-native boundary: this proof relies on existing WorkerRun, ReviewRun, EvaluationRun, WorkCycle, and ProofPacket entity transitions rather than adding orchestration code. -- Residual first-pass risk: ReviewRun, EvaluationRun, ProofPacket, and pull request IDs are not available until paw-codex-worker reports this WorkerRun done and Patrol fans out the gates. +- Residual proof-only risk: concrete rework WorkerRun, ReviewRun, EvaluationRun, and ProofPacket IDs are not available inside this local Codex process before paw-codex-worker reports completion to Temper.