From 68b70c7634f76d56099323dcc28e7234a17d3a1f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rita Date: Thu, 7 May 2026 22:50:19 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Paw Patrol WorkerRun en-019e057a-7e44-77e3-a43d-47b572fab1ad Created automatically by paw-codex-worker. WorkerRun: `en-019e057a-7e44-77e3-a43d-47b572fab1ad` Worker: `mac-mini-codex-prod` Base branch: `codex/paw-patrol-worker-reporting` Head branch: `codex/paw-patrol-052f3004` Worktree: `/Users/openclaw/Development/temperpaw-worktrees/codex-paw-patrol-052f3004` Task: You are the local Codex implementer for TemperPaw paw-patrol. WorkRequest or legacy PatrolRequest: en-019e057a-7385-74a2-9a4a-2940052f3004 FactoryCase: en-019e057a-7cd5-75d3-84a1-f84a85014902 WorkCycle: wc-019e057a-7d87-7df1-b055-473ff30df4d3 Summary: codex-live-review-rework-proof: Live Paw Patrol review-rework proof. Only add or update this Markdown file: .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T0246... Request: Live Paw Patrol review-rework proof. Only add or update this Markdown file: .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md. Required sequence: 1. First pass: create the file with a Mermaid diagram and exact marker REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: needs_changes. Do not include REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: fulfilled on the first pass. 2. Reviewer should request changes while that marker is needs_changes. 3. Rework pass: update the same file on the same branch, replace the marker with REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: fulfilled, and add one sentence saying reviewer-requested rework was fulfilled. 4. Final proof mentions the WorkCycle, WorkerRun ids, ReviewRun ids, EvaluationRun, ProofPacket, and pull request if available. 5. Use lightweight Markdown verification. Required loop: 1. Work in the assigned git worktree and branch. 2. Follow red-green TDD before implementation. 3. Keep orchestration Temper-native: entity specs, WASM integrations, and Cedar policies. 4. Run focused tests and relevant live/E2E verification for touched behavior. 5. Produce a visual ProofPacket with changed-files map, state diagram, tests, E2E evidence, risk notes, and OData links. 6. Finish normally. The paw-codex-worker will report WorkerRun.ReportDone or WorkerRun.ReportFailed to Temper after the local Codex process exits. Codex change evidence: ```git-status ?? .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md ``` ```git-diff-stat (no unstaged diff stat) ``` After this PR is reported to Temper, Patrol should run independent ReviewRun and EvaluationRun gates before human merge review. --- ...mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md | 54 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+) create mode 100644 .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md diff --git a/.proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md b/.proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md new file mode 100644 index 000000000..5d0d0f557 --- /dev/null +++ b/.proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ +# Proof Report: Mac Mini Review Rework 2026-05-08T02:46:11Z + +REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: needs_changes + +## Scope +This is the first pass for the live Paw Patrol review-rework proof. The only changed file is this Markdown proof: + +| File | Change | Reason | +|------|--------|--------| +| `.proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md` | Added | Seed the live review-rework loop with a visible proof packet and a reviewer-trigger marker. | + +No Temper entity specs, WASM integrations, Cedar policies, Rust code, scripts, or application files were changed. This proof-only change is deliberately too small for an ADR because it does not alter architecture, state machines, authorization, deployment behavior, triggers, storage, provenance, or agent capability surfaces. + +## Patrol Entities +| Entity | ID or Link | Status in this pass | +|--------|------------|---------------------| +| WorkRequest / legacy PatrolRequest | [`en-019e057a-7385-74a2-9a4a-2940052f3004`](https://openpaw-production.up.railway.app/tdata/PatrolRequests('en-019e057a-7385-74a2-9a4a-2940052f3004')) | Provided by request. | +| FactoryCase | [`en-019e057a-7cd5-75d3-84a1-f84a85014902`](https://openpaw-production.up.railway.app/tdata/FactoryCases('en-019e057a-7cd5-75d3-84a1-f84a85014902')) | Provided by request. | +| WorkCycle | [`wc-019e057a-7d87-7df1-b055-473ff30df4d3`](https://openpaw-production.up.railway.app/tdata/WorkCycles('wc-019e057a-7d87-7df1-b055-473ff30df4d3')) | First implementation pass. | +| WorkerRun ids | Pending Patrol attachment after this local Codex process reports done. | Current local prompt did not expose a WorkerRun ID. | +| ReviewRun ids | Pending reviewer request-changes gate. | Expected next step while the marker remains `needs_changes`. | +| EvaluationRun | Pending final rework approval. | Not expected to run until review passes after rework. | +| ProofPacket | Pending final proof packet entity. | This Markdown file is the visual proof packet source for the loop. | +| Pull request | Pending branch publication. | No pull request URL was available in the local prompt or environment. | + +## State Diagram +```mermaid +stateDiagram-v2 + [*] --> FirstPassRed + FirstPassRed --> FirstPassProof: create Markdown proof + FirstPassProof --> ReviewRequested: marker is REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: needs_changes + ReviewRequested --> ReviewerRequestsChanges: independent ReviewRun.RequestChanges + ReviewerRequestsChanges --> ReworkPass: new WorkerRun updates same file + ReworkPass --> FinalProof: replace marker and add rework sentence + FinalProof --> ReviewApproved: independent ReviewRun.Approve + ReviewApproved --> EvaluationPassed: EvaluationRun.Pass + EvaluationPassed --> ProofPacketReady: ProofPacket.MarkReady + ProofPacketReady --> WorkCycleComplete +``` + +## Verification +| Step | Command | Expected | Actual | +|------|---------|----------|--------| +| Red | `test -f .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md && rg -q 'REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: needs_changes' .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md && test "$(rg -c '^REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS:' .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md)" -eq 1` | Fail before implementation. | Failed with exit code 1 because the file did not exist. | +| Green | `test -f .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md && rg -q '^REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: needs_changes$' .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md && test "$(rg -c '^REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS:' .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md)" -eq 1` | File exists, contains the needs-changes marker, and contains exactly one review-rework status marker. | Passed. | +| Marker guard | `! rg -q '^REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: f[[:alpha:]_]*$' .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md` | First pass does not contain the final status marker. | Passed. | +| Markdown smoke | `rg -q '^```mermaid$' .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md && rg -q '^## Verification$' .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md && rg -q '^## E2E Evidence$' .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md && rg -q '^## Risk Notes$' .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md` | Mermaid fence and required sections are present. | Passed. | +| Diff whitespace | `git diff --check -- .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md` | No whitespace errors. | Passed. | + +## E2E Evidence +This first pass intentionally leaves the proof in the reviewer-requested state so the live Patrol loop can create a ReviewRun and request changes before rework. The final rework pass must update this same file on the same branch, replace the marker, add the reviewer-requested rework sentence, and fill in any WorkerRun, ReviewRun, EvaluationRun, ProofPacket, and pull request identifiers that Patrol creates after this pass reports done. + +## Risk Notes +The only risk in this pass is operational: if an external reviewer does not inspect the proof while the marker remains `needs_changes`, the rework loop will not be exercised. There is no code or architecture risk from this first pass because the work is limited to a single Markdown proof file. From 841068175fddbb6246acaaff9f302f157f0da4a3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rita Date: Thu, 7 May 2026 22:58:04 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Paw Patrol WorkerRun en-019e0580-b8c1-76b2-b7b5-98e656b68e7a Created automatically by paw-codex-worker. WorkerRun: `en-019e0580-b8c1-76b2-b7b5-98e656b68e7a` Worker: `mac-mini-codex-prod` Base branch: `codex/paw-patrol-worker-reporting` Head branch: `codex/paw-patrol-052f3004` Worktree: `/Users/openclaw/Development/temperpaw-worktrees/codex-paw-patrol-052f3004` Task: You are the local Codex implementer for reviewer-requested rework. FactoryCase: en-019e057a-7cd5-75d3-84a1-f84a85014902 WorkCycle: wc-019e057a-7d87-7df1-b055-473ff30df4d3 Summary: codex-live-review-rework-proof: Live Paw Patrol review-rework proof. Only add or update this Markdown file: .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T0246... Original task: You are the local Codex implementer for TemperPaw paw-patrol. WorkRequest or legacy PatrolRequest: en-019e057a-7385-74a2-9a4a-2940052f3004 FactoryCase: en-019e057a-7cd5-75d3-84a1-f84a85014902 WorkCycle: wc-019e057a-7d87-7df1-b055-473ff30df4d3 Summary: codex-live-review-rework-proof: Live Paw Patrol review-rework proof. Only add or update this Markdown file: .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T0246... Request: Live Paw Patrol review-rework proof. Only add or update this Markdown file: .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md. Required sequence: 1. First pass: create the file with a Mermaid diagram and exact marker REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: needs_changes. Do not include REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: fulfilled on the first pass. 2. Reviewer should request changes while that marker is needs_changes. 3. Rework pass: update the same file on the same branch, replace the marker with REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: fulfilled, and add one sentence saying reviewer-requested rework was fulfilled. 4. Final proof mentions the WorkCycle, WorkerRun ids, ReviewRun ids, EvaluationRun, ProofPacket, and pull request if available. 5. Use lightweight Markdown verification. Required loop: 1. Work in the assigned git worktree and branch. 2. Follow red-green TDD before implementation. 3. Keep orchestration Temper-native: entity specs, WASM integrations, and Cedar policies. 4. Run focused tests and relevant live/E2E verification for touched behavior. 5. Produce a visual ProofPacket with changed-files map, state diagram, tests, E2E evidence, risk notes, and OData links. 6. Finish normally. The paw-codex-worker will report WorkerRun.ReportDone or WorkerRun.ReportFailed to Temper after the local Codex process exits. Reviewer feedback requiring changes: Verdict: request_changes Review: WorkerRun `en-019e057a-7e44-77e3-a43d-47b572fab1ad` adds only the proof Markdown file in the relevant commit; the first-pass proof is valid, but the required loop now needs rework. Live/E2E: I performed lightweight Markdown and marker verification only; no full live system E2E was run because this review is intentionally the request-changes gate before the rework pass. Required loop: 1. Continue in the assigned git worktree and branch, updating the existing PR when one exists. 2. Address the reviewer feedback directly; keep unrelated changes out. 3. Follow red-green TDD for the correction when a test can express it. 4. Run the focused tests and live/E2E checks named by the reviewer when applicable. 5. Produce updated proof in the WorkerRun result. The paw-codex-worker will report WorkerRun.ReportDone or WorkerRun.ReportFailed to Temper after the local Codex process exits. Codex change evidence: ```git-status M .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md ``` ```git-diff-stat .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md | 67 +++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) ``` After this PR is reported to Temper, Patrol should run independent ReviewRun and EvaluationRun gates before human merge review. --- ...mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md | 67 +++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) diff --git a/.proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md b/.proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md index 5d0d0f557..c91fa5f14 100644 --- a/.proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md +++ b/.proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md @@ -1,54 +1,67 @@ # Proof Report: Mac Mini Review Rework 2026-05-08T02:46:11Z -REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: needs_changes +REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: fulfilled ## Scope -This is the first pass for the live Paw Patrol review-rework proof. The only changed file is this Markdown proof: +This is the rework pass for the live Paw Patrol review-rework proof. The reviewer-requested rework was fulfilled. + +Only this Markdown proof was updated: | File | Change | Reason | |------|--------|--------| -| `.proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md` | Added | Seed the live review-rework loop with a visible proof packet and a reviewer-trigger marker. | +| `.proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md` | Updated | Replace the review-rework status marker, add the rework fulfillment sentence, and record final proof identifiers. | -No Temper entity specs, WASM integrations, Cedar policies, Rust code, scripts, or application files were changed. This proof-only change is deliberately too small for an ADR because it does not alter architecture, state machines, authorization, deployment behavior, triggers, storage, provenance, or agent capability surfaces. +No Temper entity specs, WASM integrations, Cedar policies, Rust code, scripts, or application files were changed. This proof-only rework is deliberately too small for an ADR because it does not alter architecture, state machines, authorization, deployment behavior, triggers, storage, provenance, or agent capability surfaces. ## Patrol Entities | Entity | ID or Link | Status in this pass | |--------|------------|---------------------| -| WorkRequest / legacy PatrolRequest | [`en-019e057a-7385-74a2-9a4a-2940052f3004`](https://openpaw-production.up.railway.app/tdata/PatrolRequests('en-019e057a-7385-74a2-9a4a-2940052f3004')) | Provided by request. | -| FactoryCase | [`en-019e057a-7cd5-75d3-84a1-f84a85014902`](https://openpaw-production.up.railway.app/tdata/FactoryCases('en-019e057a-7cd5-75d3-84a1-f84a85014902')) | Provided by request. | -| WorkCycle | [`wc-019e057a-7d87-7df1-b055-473ff30df4d3`](https://openpaw-production.up.railway.app/tdata/WorkCycles('wc-019e057a-7d87-7df1-b055-473ff30df4d3')) | First implementation pass. | -| WorkerRun ids | Pending Patrol attachment after this local Codex process reports done. | Current local prompt did not expose a WorkerRun ID. | -| ReviewRun ids | Pending reviewer request-changes gate. | Expected next step while the marker remains `needs_changes`. | -| EvaluationRun | Pending final rework approval. | Not expected to run until review passes after rework. | -| ProofPacket | Pending final proof packet entity. | This Markdown file is the visual proof packet source for the loop. | -| Pull request | Pending branch publication. | No pull request URL was available in the local prompt or environment. | +| WorkRequest / legacy PatrolRequest | [`en-019e057a-7385-74a2-9a4a-2940052f3004`](https://openpaw-production.up.railway.app/tdata/PatrolRequests('en-019e057a-7385-74a2-9a4a-2940052f3004')) | Original request. | +| FactoryCase | [`en-019e057a-7cd5-75d3-84a1-f84a85014902`](https://openpaw-production.up.railway.app/tdata/FactoryCases('en-019e057a-7cd5-75d3-84a1-f84a85014902')) | Original factory case. | +| WorkCycle | [`wc-019e057a-7d87-7df1-b055-473ff30df4d3`](https://openpaw-production.up.railway.app/tdata/WorkCycles('wc-019e057a-7d87-7df1-b055-473ff30df4d3')) | InProgress during local rework verification. | +| WorkerRun ids | First pass: [`en-019e057a-7e44-77e3-a43d-47b572fab1ad`](https://openpaw-production.up.railway.app/tdata/WorkerRuns('en-019e057a-7e44-77e3-a43d-47b572fab1ad')); rework pass: [`en-019e0580-b8c1-76b2-b7b5-98e656b68e7a`](https://openpaw-production.up.railway.app/tdata/WorkerRuns('en-019e0580-b8c1-76b2-b7b5-98e656b68e7a')) | First pass is Done; rework pass was Running when queried before this local Codex exit. | +| ReviewRun ids | [`en-019e057e-503f-7a61-8831-d43eda63c55d`](https://openpaw-production.up.railway.app/tdata/ReviewRuns('en-019e057e-503f-7a61-8831-d43eda63c55d')) | ChangesRequested gate that triggered this rework. | +| EvaluationRun | [`en-019e057e-5106-7222-8d1c-835ce5be1dab`](https://openpaw-production.up.railway.app/tdata/EvaluationRuns('en-019e057e-5106-7222-8d1c-835ce5be1dab')) | Queued during local rework verification. | +| ProofPacket | [`en-019e057e-4f76-7321-b596-c1284eb49a26`](https://openpaw-production.up.railway.app/tdata/ProofPackets('en-019e057e-4f76-7321-b596-c1284eb49a26')) | First-pass proof packet was Rejected by the request-changes gate; this Markdown file is the updated proof source for the rework WorkerRun result. | +| Pull request | [PR #237](https://github.com/nerdsane/temperpaw/pull/237) | Existing open PR for branch `codex/paw-patrol-052f3004`. | ## State Diagram ```mermaid stateDiagram-v2 - [*] --> FirstPassRed - FirstPassRed --> FirstPassProof: create Markdown proof - FirstPassProof --> ReviewRequested: marker is REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: needs_changes - ReviewRequested --> ReviewerRequestsChanges: independent ReviewRun.RequestChanges - ReviewerRequestsChanges --> ReworkPass: new WorkerRun updates same file - ReworkPass --> FinalProof: replace marker and add rework sentence - FinalProof --> ReviewApproved: independent ReviewRun.Approve - ReviewApproved --> EvaluationPassed: EvaluationRun.Pass - EvaluationPassed --> ProofPacketReady: ProofPacket.MarkReady - ProofPacketReady --> WorkCycleComplete + [*] --> FirstPassProof + FirstPassProof --> ReviewRequested: first-pass marker published + ReviewRequested --> ReviewChangesRequested: ReviewRun en-019e057e-503f-7a61-8831-d43eda63c55d + ReviewChangesRequested --> ReworkWorkerRun: WorkerRun en-019e0580-b8c1-76b2-b7b5-98e656b68e7a + ReworkWorkerRun --> FinalProof: REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS fulfilled + FinalProof --> LightweightMarkdownVerified + LightweightMarkdownVerified --> WorkerRunReportDone: paw-codex-worker reports after Codex exits + WorkerRunReportDone --> ReviewerRechecks + ReviewerRechecks --> EvaluationRun + EvaluationRun --> ProofPacketUpdated + ProofPacketUpdated --> WorkCycleComplete ``` ## Verification | Step | Command | Expected | Actual | |------|---------|----------|--------| -| Red | `test -f .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md && rg -q 'REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: needs_changes' .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md && test "$(rg -c '^REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS:' .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md)" -eq 1` | Fail before implementation. | Failed with exit code 1 because the file did not exist. | -| Green | `test -f .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md && rg -q '^REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: needs_changes$' .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md && test "$(rg -c '^REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS:' .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md)" -eq 1` | File exists, contains the needs-changes marker, and contains exactly one review-rework status marker. | Passed. | -| Marker guard | `! rg -q '^REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: f[[:alpha:]_]*$' .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md` | First pass does not contain the final status marker. | Passed. | +| Red | `test -f .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md && rg -q '^REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: fulfilled$' .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md && test "$(rg -c '^REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS:' .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md)" -eq 1 && rg -q 'reviewer-requested rework was fulfilled' .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md` | Fail before rework. | Failed with exit code 1 before this update because the final marker and fulfillment sentence were not both present. | +| Green | `test -f .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md && rg -q '^REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS: fulfilled$' .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md && test "$(rg -c '^REVIEW_REWORK_STATUS:' .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md)" -eq 1 && rg -q 'reviewer-requested rework was fulfilled' .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md` | Final marker exists exactly once and the required sentence is present. | Passed. | | Markdown smoke | `rg -q '^```mermaid$' .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md && rg -q '^## Verification$' .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md && rg -q '^## E2E Evidence$' .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md && rg -q '^## Risk Notes$' .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md` | Mermaid fence and required sections are present. | Passed. | | Diff whitespace | `git diff --check -- .proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md` | No whitespace errors. | Passed. | +| Scope guard | `git status --short && git diff --name-only` | Only `.proofs/mac-mini-review-rework-20260508T024611Z.md` is changed. | Passed. | ## E2E Evidence -This first pass intentionally leaves the proof in the reviewer-requested state so the live Patrol loop can create a ReviewRun and request changes before rework. The final rework pass must update this same file on the same branch, replace the marker, add the reviewer-requested rework sentence, and fill in any WorkerRun, ReviewRun, EvaluationRun, ProofPacket, and pull request identifiers that Patrol creates after this pass reports done. +This was a Markdown-only rework and did not touch runtime behavior, Temper apps, triggers, WASM integrations, policies, or Rust crates. The applicable live verification was lightweight proof verification plus entity lookup: + +| Check | Evidence | +|-------|----------| +| Existing PR lookup | `gh pr view --json number,url,headRefName,state` returned open PR #237 for `codex/paw-patrol-052f3004`. | +| WorkCycle lookup | OData returned `Status=InProgress`, `reviewer_run_id=en-019e057e-503f-7a61-8831-d43eda63c55d`, `evaluation_run_id=en-019e057e-5106-7222-8d1c-835ce5be1dab`, and `implementer_worker_run_id=en-019e0580-b8c1-76b2-b7b5-98e656b68e7a`. | +| ReviewRun lookup | OData returned `Status=ChangesRequested` for `en-019e057e-503f-7a61-8831-d43eda63c55d`. | +| EvaluationRun lookup | OData returned `Status=Queued` for `en-019e057e-5106-7222-8d1c-835ce5be1dab`. | +| ProofPacket lookup | OData returned `Status=Rejected` for first-pass ProofPacket `en-019e057e-4f76-7321-b596-c1284eb49a26`, matching the review-rework gate. | + +Full server boot, cargo test suites, and user-facing transport simulations were not run because the reviewer explicitly scoped this gate to lightweight Markdown and marker verification, and this rework changes only the proof file. ## Risk Notes -The only risk in this pass is operational: if an external reviewer does not inspect the proof while the marker remains `needs_changes`, the rework loop will not be exercised. There is no code or architecture risk from this first pass because the work is limited to a single Markdown proof file. +The remaining risk is limited to Patrol timing: the rework WorkerRun and any new proof packet are finalized by `paw-codex-worker` after this local Codex process exits. There is no application behavior risk from this rework because no executable code, Temper entity spec, WASM integration, Cedar policy, trigger, or deployment file changed.