Currently, when adding an entity, you can select an EntityType from the dropdown menu addEntityType, which includes options such as contact, IP, and domain.
I see significant potential for Crime-Mapper to be applied in other domains if users were able to extend/define their own EntityTypes and utilize them throughout the application. This flexibility would greatly enhance the tool’s usability beyond predefined categories.
For instance, in my professional work, I might need to define EntityTypes such as region, AD, FD, or jurisdiction. Additionally, from a forensic history perspective, I could introduce entirely different nodes tailored to historical investigations—capturing events that predate the era of modern computing.
Currently, when adding an entity, you can select an EntityType from the dropdown menu addEntityType, which includes options such as contact, IP, and domain.
I see significant potential for Crime-Mapper to be applied in other domains if users were able to extend/define their own EntityTypes and utilize them throughout the application. This flexibility would greatly enhance the tool’s usability beyond predefined categories.
For instance, in my professional work, I might need to define EntityTypes such as region, AD, FD, or jurisdiction. Additionally, from a forensic history perspective, I could introduce entirely different nodes tailored to historical investigations—capturing events that predate the era of modern computing.