Skip to content

file *.switch.bed #167

Description

@cip25

Hi, I’m reviewing .switch.bed files from haplotype phasing and want to confirm my understanding:

Short: small haplotype switches, likely less reliable.

Long: large consistent haplotype blocks, generally more reliable.

Switchback: regions where the haplotype “switches back,” important to check in triobinning.

When deciding whether to replace or validate a fragment flagged as erroneous or less reliable, should I focus mainly on switchback and long regions, while treating short regions as lower priority?

Any confirmation or reference to documentation/papers would be appreciated.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions