Leverage the 'inject' package.

[gmosx]

To be inter-operable with other DI implementations.

[ltackmann]

Great idea

[MikeMitterer]

You have a reason for not implementing / using the "inject" package?

BTW+OT: At the moment I'm using the DI package but I am thinking about to switch to dice? Did you make performance comparisons between dice and di? DI uses a static injector - do you have some pros and cons for me? (OK I know that you need a transformer for the static injector and you can avoid mirrors but is there more?) thx!

[MikeMitterer]

Sorry, forget my first question. I just saw that DI doesn't gives a s... on interop and also ignores the inject package... but I'm still interested about your opinion on static injectors...

[ltackmann]

Hi, thanks for the question and sorry for the delay in answering it

I have simply not gotten around to implement the inject package, but will happily receive patches ;). Regarding static injectors I am no big fan of them but if they can be implemented without impacting Dices API to much then I will gladly receive suggestions.