You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The policy decision is complete. This parent remains open because implementation and the report-only observation pilot are not complete.
Corrected problem statement
The repository has high agent implementation capacity but bounded shared integration capacity. The constrained resources are distinct:
overlapping writers on the same issue or shared control-plane component;
local worktree, environment, scratch, and disk capacity;
hosted CI and optional matrix capacity;
exact-head review, domain review, author decisions, and merge attention; and
external operations such as SLURM, artifact publication, and release actions.
Raw open-PR count is diagnostic only. Draft, blocked, parked, author-decision, Dependabot, security, superseded, and merge-ready states have different integration costs.
Frozen policy
Do not apply a global cap to ordinary issue claims, independent local implementation, worktree creation, or draft preparation PRs.
Keep one active writer per issue and bound writers on conflicting shared components.
Permit draft/preparation PRs. They should receive cheap ownership and contract checks until integration admission.
Require explicit lane-specific admission before full hosted CI, exact-head review, repeated current-main refresh, merge-ready, merge-queue participation, or external operations.
Treat writer, host, CI, ordinary/domain/author review, and external-operation capacity as separate lanes.
When main has a confirmed common baseline failure, continue focused implementation and validation, but defer redundant full-readiness runs. One complete current-base proof remains mandatory before merge.
Use transparent categorical dimensions, not one opaque score:
Permit narrow, audited priority handling for P0 red-main repair, security incidents, shared-baseline repair, and work that directly reduces blocked WIP. Evidence and merge gates still apply.
Prepared candidates expire after seven days without a meaningful head, owner, evidence, or dependency update. Expiry parks integration admission; it does not delete work.
Re-entry after expiry requires owner and ancestry readback, focused validation, and current-base proof where the work is base-sensitive.
Exact-head, ownership, domain-review, evidence-admission, and merge-authority contracts remain fail-closed.
Claim boundary
Repository workflow-policy and integration-capacity control only. This issue does not change benchmark semantics, planner behavior, metric definitions, scientific evidence, compute authorization, release decisions, issue priority, or dissertation claims.
Current ruling
The maintainer selected Option B: adaptive, resource-specific integration admission in the canonical ruling comment:
The policy decision is complete. This parent remains open because implementation and the report-only observation pilot are not complete.
Corrected problem statement
The repository has high agent implementation capacity but bounded shared integration capacity. The constrained resources are distinct:
Raw open-PR count is diagnostic only. Draft, blocked, parked, author-decision, Dependabot, security, superseded, and merge-ready states have different integration costs.
Frozen policy
merge-ready, merge-queue participation, or external operations.mainhas a confirmed common baseline failure, continue focused implementation and validation, but defer redundant full-readiness runs. One complete current-base proof remains mandatory before merge.Authorized child graph
Do not open a second integration-admission implementation. #7647 is the single bounded child authorized by the ruling.
Report-only pilot
Run report-only for 14 days and at least 20 terminal PR dispositions. Extend to 28 days if the sample remains smaller.
Retain the policy only if useful terminal throughput is not materially reduced and the following do not worsen:
Revise or roll back if the policy reduces useful throughput without a compensating reduction in integration waste or defects.
Parent completion criteria
Claim boundary
Repository workflow-policy and integration-capacity control only. This issue does not change benchmark semantics, planner behavior, metric definitions, scientific evidence, compute authorization, release decisions, issue priority, or dissertation claims.
Related work