Version: 2.0.2.22796
pjass.exe -v -> pjass.exe version git-f128812
Alright, it's kinda cool it leaks their internal repo's commit ID. This doesn't appear to be any of our commit IDs, so I assume they don't have pjass embedded as a git submodule (not entirely sure?), but it resides inside their monorepo. The reported version commit ID is useless to us. It's set as part of the makefile script.
Do we care to include a "static" version identifier in addition to commit ID? To have a repository agnostic way to figure out what version is running... what version Reforged is running? Though in this case they may never update their copy-pasted version anyway.
Version: 2.0.2.22796
pjass.exe -v->pjass.exe version git-f128812Alright, it's kinda cool it leaks their internal repo's commit ID. This doesn't appear to be any of our commit IDs, so I assume they don't have pjass embedded as a git submodule (not entirely sure?), but it resides inside their monorepo. The reported version commit ID is useless to us. It's set as part of the makefile script.
Do we care to include a "static" version identifier in addition to commit ID? To have a repository agnostic way to figure out what version is running... what version Reforged is running? Though in this case they may never update their copy-pasted version anyway.