optolink (much) slower than vitoconnect

[ll3141]

hi,

I tried to switch my installation of https://github.com/dannerph/esphome_vitoconnect to your component because it has more features, but ...

optolink is unable to cope with the 19 sensors every 15s I have currently set up.

I have the impression, that optolink reads only one datapoint per second (sync from controller), whereas the vitoconnect component requests all queued datapoints in one go. The KW protocol allows to send request one after another, without waiting for a sync each time.

Ok, I could reduce extend the update interval, but ...

I would like to use the optolink component, because vitoconnect only provides sensors and binary-sensors.

Lorenz

[kaeon]

Also changing from vitoconnect and experiencing the same, did you found a workaround to make it better?

[ll3141]

I went back to https://github.com/dannerph/esphome_vitoconnect and didn't check since. Now that the branch is merged it might be time to try again, but I'm reluctant to do so because my setup is working perfectly as is 8-)