Skip to content

Greasing considerations to endpoint features #3

Description

@chris-wood

In my mind, greasing is currently defined with respect to protocol features, with something like the QUIC spin bit being one obvious example. However, the concepts and motivations behind greasing can also extend to endpoint features themselves, such as deciding whether or not to use QUIC at all in the first place. The Privacy Pass specification applies this pattern, wherein client implementations can choose to provide tokens when asked or not (according to some local grease implementation behavior). If we believe that greasing extends to features in this way, should the document talk about it, and if so, what should it say?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions