Skip to content

ISA: sub-registry vs registry #157

Description

@dthaler

Amanda Baber (IANA) wrote:

Just a terminology note: it sounds like the occurrences of the terms "sub-registries" and "sub-registry" in the IANA Considerations should be replaced (as Roman suggested) with "registries" and "registry." It looks like were just overlooked, since you specify elsewhere in that section that "BPF Instructions" is the name of the registry group and "BPF Instruction Conformance Groups" and "BPF Instruction Set" are registries.

In this context, an example of a "sub-registry" would be a registry for "atomic32" or "aaa."

I'll go ahead and mark this "IANA OK."

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions