Investigate the patches from oxcaml

[kit-ty-kate]

oxcaml/opam-repository#11 (comment)

[hannesm]

oh, may it be that gnu patch is happy if at least one out of many hunks apply cleanly? and this patch requires all hunks to apply!?

[kit-ty-kate]

probably not, if that was the case that would be a serious bug in GNU patch i would say (ignoring part of the patch while applying the rest and succeed)

[hannesm]

So here's the files array.js and array.wat (renamed to array.wat.js) before the patch:

array.js

array.wat.js

and here's the original patch

js_of_ocaml-iarray-primitives.patch

My patch (this is "patch 2.0-12u11 FreeBSD") reports:

Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- a/runtime/js/array.js
|+++ b/runtime/js/array.js
--------------------------
Patching file runtime/js/array.js using Plan A...
Hunk #1 failed at 131.
1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to runtime/js/array.js.rej
Hmm...  The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- a/runtime/wasm/array.wat
|+++ b/runtime/wasm/array.wat
--------------------------
Patching file runtime/wasm/array.wat using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 395 (offset 102 lines).
done

A GNU patch ("GNU patch 2.7.6") reports:

patching file runtime/js/array.js
Hunk #1 succeeded at 230 with fuzz 2 (offset 99 lines).
patching file runtime/wasm/array.wat
Hunk #1 succeeded at 395 (offset 102 lines).