It seems that the markdown explanation cannot match the code.
By checking the original paper, it seems that the markdown is correct.
However, according to the iteration steps,
I think it is more probable that you swap the definition of u_k and v_k (I also tested on my local environment. It seems to make more sense to change the markdown session. Swapping u and v in code gave me wrong results)
It seems that the markdown explanation cannot match the code.
By checking the original paper, it seems that the markdown is correct.
However, according to the iteration steps,
I think it is more probable that you swap the definition of u_k and v_k (I also tested on my local environment. It seems to make more sense to change the markdown session. Swapping
uandvin code gave me wrong results)