finish options

[samjtro]

Need to decide on a path forward for these sooner rather than later. Functions will either be individually typed (ie func Butterfly() []BUTTERFLY {}) OR grouped (ie func Butterfly() []STRATEGY {}). Need to do research into what the responses will look like from tda in all circumstances. If there are significant differences, individually typed but if not, group it.

[samjtro]

I need to get around to this eventually. I have separated all of the functions from the main file for readability; added benefit is that each file can have a separate Contract type to record data.
Makes this much easier

[samjtro]

From the looks of it, it seems that all of the different strategies (besides Analytical) use the same basic return structure. We can utilize a standard UNDERLYING/CONTRACT layout for all of the different strategies.

It is just going to be a question of creating custom structs for certain legs of the different strategies.

[samjtro]

I am about 20% complete with this.

I am going to be using a Standard layout for all spreads, and a custom Interface (potentially struct) with maps of CONTRACTs for certain option calls. Most, however, are fairly straight forward in their returns.