Create Components that can do block breaks / block places.

[rourke750]

Possible feature is having certain factories that have pipes that go to other blocks and break either a block or row of blocks in front of it.

[gmlaxfanatic]

A major issue here is that block changes trigger chunk loading, so these
would either be chunk loaders themselves or require chunk loaders in one
form or another.

A fix could be caching the breaks, but that will have interesting
intrachunk edge cases.

On Sat, Mar 28, 2015, 3:42 PM rourke750 notifications@github.com wrote:

Possible feature is having certain factories that have pipes that go to
other blocks and break either a block or row of blocks in front of it.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#28.

[rourke750]

We could make it so the chunk had to be loaded and implement chunk loaders
as well.
On Mar 28, 2015 4:48 PM, "gmlaxfanatic" notifications@github.com wrote:

A major issue here is that block changes trigger chunk loading, so these
would either be chunk loaders themselves or require chunk loaders in one
form or another.

A fix could be caching the breaks, but that will have interesting
intrachunk edge cases.

On Sat, Mar 28, 2015, 3:42 PM rourke750 notifications@github.com wrote:

Possible feature is having certain factories that have pipes that go to
other blocks and break either a block or row of blocks in front of it.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#28.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#28 (comment)
.

[gmlaxfanatic]

Yeah, but I think encouraging chunk loading is the opposite direction we
want to head performance wise. A core role of RealisticBiome is to remove
the need for chunk loading.

Also, we already have chunk loaders in game, basically just as
players/bots.

On Sat, Mar 28, 2015, 3:51 PM rourke750 notifications@github.com wrote:

We could make it so the chunk had to be loaded and implement chunk loaders
as well.
On Mar 28, 2015 4:48 PM, "gmlaxfanatic" notifications@github.com wrote:

A major issue here is that block changes trigger chunk loading, so these
would either be chunk loaders themselves or require chunk loaders in one
form or another.

A fix could be caching the breaks, but that will have interesting
intrachunk edge cases.

On Sat, Mar 28, 2015, 3:42 PM rourke750 notifications@github.com
wrote:

Possible feature is having certain factories that have pipes that go to
other blocks and break either a block or row of blocks in front of it.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#28.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
<
#28 (comment)

.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#28 (comment)
.