references.bib

@article{byrne1971ubiquitous,
  title     = {The ubiquitous relationship: Attitude similarity and attraction: A cross-cultural study},
  author    = {Byrne, Dorm and Gouaux, Charles and Griffitt, William and Lamberth, John and Murakawa, NBPM and Prasad, M and Prasad, Atma and Ramirez III, M},
  journal   = {Human Relations},
  volume    = {24},
  number    = {3},
  pages     = {201--207},
  year      = {1971},
  publisher = {Sage Publications Sage CA: Thousand Oaks, CA},
  note      = {Cross-cultural study of the relationship between attitude similarity and attraction, showing that this relationship is consistent across different cultures. Use to show the ubiquity of homophily.}
}
@article{novak1968rejection,
  title={Rejection as a consequence of perceived similarity.},
  author={Novak, David W and Lerner, Melvin J},
  journal={Journal of personality and social psychology},
  volume={9},
  number={2p1},
  pages={147},
  year={1968},
  publisher={American Psychological Association}
}
@book{berscheid1969interpersonal,
  title={Interpersonal attraction},
  author={Berscheid, Ellen and Hatfield, Elaine},
  volume={69},
  year={1969},
  publisher={Addison-Wesley Reading, MA}
}
@article{ajzen1974effects,
  title={Effects of information on interpersonal attraction: Similarity versus affective value.},
  author={Ajzen, Icek},
  journal={Journal of Personality and Social Psychology},
  volume={29},
  number={3},
  pages={374},
  year={1974},
  publisher={American Psychological Association}
}
@article{reagans2001networks,
  title={Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R\&D teams},
  author={Reagans, Ray and Zuckerman, Ezra W},
  journal={Organization science},
  volume={12},
  number={4},
  pages={502--517},
  year={2001},
  publisher={INFORMS}
}
@article{zell2020better,
  title={The better-than-average effect in comparative self-evaluation: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis.},
  author={Zell, Ethan and Strickhouser, Jason E and Sedikides, Constantine and Alicke, Mark D},
  journal={Psychological bulletin},
  volume={146},
  number={2},
  pages={118},
  year={2020},
  publisher={American Psychological Association}
}
@article{tajfel1979integrative,
  title={An integrative theory of intergroup conflict},
  author={Tajfel, Henri and Turner, John C and Austin, William G and Worchel, Stephen},
  journal={Organizational identity: A reader},
  volume={56},
  number={65},
  pages={9780203505984--16},
  year={1979},
  publisher={Oxford University Press},
  note = {Social Identity Theory (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) holds that we categorize ourselves and others into social groups, favoring those we perceive as ingroup members. Demographic similarity (e.g. shared gender, ethnicity) often signals ingroup status, eliciting ingroup favoritism -- an automatic tendency to prefer “people who are like us” under the additional assumption that similarity corresponds to ingroup membership. Reviewed experiments construct "minimal groups" from random or arbitrary assortment and find that this is sufficient to establish favoritism.Suggests an intrinsic preference for self-similar others that may be contrasted with an instrumental account of homophily, where self-similarity is a signal of prospective relational benefits. I could use this to set up the contrast or in a review of the literature on homophily.} 
}
@article{yamagishi1999bounded,
  title={Bounded generalized reciprocity: Ingroup boasting and ingroup favoritism},
  author={Yamagishi, Toshio},
  journal={Advances in group processes},
  volume={16},
  pages={161},
  year={1999}
}

@article{heine2002interjudge,
  title={Interjudge agreement, self-enhancement, and liking: Cross-cultural divergences},
  author={Heine, Steven J and Renshaw, Kristen},
  journal={Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin},
  volume={28},
  number={5},
  pages={578--587},
  year={2002},
  publisher={Sage Publications Sage CA: Thousand Oaks, CA}
}
@techreport{calder2021diversity,
  title       = {Diversity and performance in entrepreneurial teams},
  author      = {Calder-Wang, Sophie and Gompers, Paul A and Huang, Kevin},
  year        = {2021},
  institution = {National Bureau of Economic Research},
  notes       = {Two key findings. First, entrepreneurial team formation is driven by homophily. Second, diversity in entrepreneurial teams is associated with worse performance, though attenuated when members voluntarily select into teams. This suggests that while homophily is a strong driver of team formation, diversity may not always lead to better outcomes in entrepreneurial settings. Can cite this to show ubiquity of homophily in team formation and its implications for performance.}
}
@inproceedings{alhazmi2017empirical,
  title={An empirical study on team formation in online games},
  author={Alhazmi, Essa and Horawalavithana, Sameera and Skvoretz, John and Blackburn, Jeremy and Iamnitchi, Adriana},
  booktitle={Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE/ACM international conference on advances in social networks analysis and mining 2017},
  pages={431--438},
  year={2017}
}
@article{currarini2010identifying,
  title     = {Identifying the roles of race-based choice and chance in high school friendship network formation},
  author    = {Currarini, Sergio and Jackson, Matthew O and Pin, Paolo},
  journal   = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences},
  volume    = {107},
  number    = {11},
  pages     = {4857--4861},
  year      = {2010},
  publisher = {National Academy of Sciences}
}
@article{launay2015playing,
  title={Playing with strangers: which shared traits attract us most to new people?},
  author={Launay, Jacques and Dunbar, Robin IM},
  journal={PloS one},
  volume={10},
  number={6},
  pages={e0129688},
  year={2015},
  publisher={Public Library of Science San Francisco, CA USA}
}
@article{stallen2023partner,
  title={Partner choice and cooperation in social dilemmas can increase resource inequality},
  author={Stallen, Mirre and Snijder, Luuk L and Gross, J{\"o}rg and Hilbert, Leon P and De Dreu, Carsten KW},
  journal={Nature Communications},
  volume={14},
  number={1},
  pages={6432},
  year={2023},
  publisher={Nature Publishing Group UK London}
}
@article{ertug2022does,
  title={What does homophily do? A review of the consequences of homophily},
  author={Ertug, Gokhan and Brennecke, Julia and Kov{\'a}cs, Bal{\'a}zs and Zou, Tengjian},
  journal={Academy of Management Annals},
  volume={16},
  number={1},
  pages={38--69},
  year={2022},
  publisher={Briarcliff Manor, NY},
  notes = {Useful literature review of the consequences of homophily, classifying into benefits for social cohesion and trust but also costs in terms of homogeny of information, skills, social resources. Useful for motivating the study of homophily but also for positing that context-dependent homophily may reflect sensitivity to these trade-offs.}
}
@article{currarini2016simple,
  title     = {A simple model of homophily in social networks},
  author    = {Currarini, Sergio and Matheson, Jesse and Vega-Redondo, Fernando},
  journal   = {European Economic Review},
  volume    = {90},
  pages     = {18--39},
  year      = {2016},
  publisher = {Elsevier}
}
@article{de2021no,
  title     = {No echo in the chambers of political interactions on Reddit},
  author    = {De Francisci Morales, Gianmarco and Monti, Corrado and Starnini, Michele},
  journal   = {Scientific reports},
  volume    = {11},
  number    = {1},
  pages     = {2818},
  year      = {2021},
  publisher = {Nature Publishing Group UK London}
}

@article{fischer2020two,
  title     = {Two field experiments on self-selection, collaboration intensity, and team performance},
  author    = {Fischer, Mira and Rilke, Rainer Michael and Yurtoglu, B Burcin},
  year      = {2020},
  publisher = {IZA Discussion Paper}
}
@article{rivera2012hiring,
  title={Hiring as cultural matching: The case of elite professional service firms},
  author={Rivera, Lauren A},
  journal={American sociological review},
  volume={77},
  number={6},
  pages={999--1022},
  year={2012},
  publisher={Sage Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA}
}
@article{ruef2003structure,
  title={The structure of founding teams: Homophily, strong ties, and isolation among US entrepreneurs},
  author={Ruef, Martin and Aldrich, Howard E and Carter, Nancy M},
  journal={American sociological review},
  volume={68},
  number={2},
  pages={195--222},
  year={2003},
  publisher={Sage Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA},
  note={Great citation for confirming that homophily is a strong driver of team formation in entrepreneurial settings. It shows that founders tend to form teams with individuals who share similar backgrounds, experiences, and characteristics, which can lead to isolation from diverse perspectives. This supports the idea that homophily is a significant factor in team dynamics and performance.}
}
@article{goldenberg2023homophily,
  title     = {Homophily and acrophily as drivers of political segregation},
  author    = {Goldenberg, Amit and Abruzzo, Joseph M and Huang, Zi and Sch{\"o}ne, Jonas and Bailey, David and Willer, Robb and Halperin, Eran and Gross, James J},
  journal   = {Nature Human Behaviour},
  volume    = {7},
  number    = {2},
  pages     = {219--230},
  year      = {2023},
  publisher = {Nature Publishing Group UK London}
}
@article{wimmer2010beyond,
  title={Beyond and below racial homophily: ERG models of a friendship network documented on Facebook},
  author={Wimmer, Andreas and Lewis, Kevin},
  journal={American journal of sociology},
  volume={116},
  number={2},
  pages={583--642},
  year={2010},
  publisher={The University of Chicago Press}
}
@article{halberstam2016homophily,
  title     = {Homophily, group size, and the diffusion of political information in social networks: Evidence from Twitter},
  author    = {Halberstam, Yosh and Knight, Brian},
  journal   = {Journal of public economics},
  volume    = {143},
  pages     = {73--88},
  year      = {2016},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  notes = {Focuses on the role of homophily – a tendency to interact with similar individuals–in the diffusion of political information in social networks. Users are disproportionately exposed to like-minded information and that information reaches like-minded users more quickly. Users affiliated with majority political groups, relative to the minority group, have more connections, are exposed to more information, and are exposed to information more quickly. Useful contemporary empirical source re: mixed of homophily. }
}
@article{dehghani2016purity,
  title={Purity homophily in social networks.},
  author={Dehghani, Morteza and Johnson, Kate and Hoover, Joe and Sagi, Eyal and Garten, Justin and Parmar, Niki Jitendra and Vaisey, Stephen and Iliev, Rumen and Graham, Jesse},
  journal={Journal of Experimental Psychology: General},
  volume={145},
  number={3},
  pages={366},
  year={2016},
  publisher={American Psychological Association},
  notes={Contemporary evidence. Analysis of a corpus of over 700,000 tweets. Observes homophily on basis of shared moral values, specifically purity (but not other moral content). Example of homophily on basis of values rather than demographic or other features. Also example of homophily as something variable: some self-similarity valued (purity) while others irrelevant (e.g. fairness).}
}
@article{huber2017political,
  title     = {Political homophily in social relationships: Evidence from online dating behavior},
  author    = {Huber, Gregory A and Malhotra, Neil},
  journal   = {The Journal of Politics},
  volume    = {79},
  number    = {1},
  pages     = {269--283},
  year      = {2017},
  publisher = {University of Chicago Press Chicago, IL}
}

@article{kossinets2009origins,
  title     = {Origins of homophily in an evolving social network},
  author    = {Kossinets, Gueorgi and Watts, Duncan J},
  journal   = {American journal of sociology},
  volume    = {115},
  number    = {2},
  pages     = {405--450},
  year      = {2009},
  publisher = {The University of Chicago Press},
  notes = {Influential paper establishes choice homophily confirming that highly similar pairs do show greater than average propensity to form new ties in university communities.}
}


@article{ma2015chicago,
  title     = {The Chicago face database: A free stimulus set of faces and norming data},
  author    = {Ma, Debbie S and Correll, Joshua and Wittenbrink, Bernd},
  journal   = {Behavior research methods},
  volume    = {47},
  pages     = {1122--1135},
  year      = {2015},
  publisher = {Springer}
}
@article{kaplan1973information,
  title={Information integration theory and reinforcement theory as approaches to interpersonal attraction.},
  author={Kaplan, Martin F and Anderson, Norman H},
  journal={Journal of Personality and Social Psychology},
  volume={28},
  number={3},
  pages={301},
  year={1973},
  publisher={American Psychological Association}
}
@article{mcpherson2001birds,
  title     = {Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks},
  author    = {McPherson, Miller and Smith-Lovin, Lynn and Cook, James M},
  journal   = {Annual review of sociology},
  volume    = {27},
  number    = {1},
  pages     = {415--444},
  year      = {2001},
  publisher = {Annual Reviews 4139 El Camino Way, PO Box 10139, Palo Alto, CA 94303-0139, USA}
}
@article{lincoln1979work,
  title={Work and friendship ties in organizations: A comparative analysis of relation networks},
  author={Lincoln, James R and Miller, Jon},
  journal={Administrative science quarterly},
  pages={181--199},
  year={1979},
  publisher={JSTOR}
}
@article{mcmillan2022worth,
  title={Worth the weight: Conceptualizing and measuring strong versus weak tie homophily},
  author={McMillan, Cassie},
  journal={Social networks},
  volume={68},
  pages={139--147},
  year={2022},
  publisher={Elsevier}
}
@article{mcmillan2022strong,
  title={Strong and weak tie homophily in adolescent friendship networks: An analysis of same-race and same-gender ties},
  author={McMillan, Cassie},
  journal={Network Science},
  volume={10},
  number={3},
  pages={283--300},
  year={2022},
  publisher={Cambridge University Press}
}
@article{olivola2010elected,
  title={Elected in 100 milliseconds: Appearance-based trait inferences and voting},
  author={Olivola, Christopher Y and Todorov, Alexander},
  journal={Journal of nonverbal behavior},
  volume={34},
  pages={83--110},
  year={2010},
  publisher={Springer}
}
@article{oosterhof2008functional,
  title={The functional basis of face evaluation},
  author={Oosterhof, Nikolaas N and Todorov, Alexander},
  journal={Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences},
  volume={105},
  number={32},
  pages={11087--11092},
  year={2008},
  publisher={National Academy of Sciences}
}
@article{montoya2013meta,
  title={A meta-analytic investigation of the processes underlying the similarity-attraction effect},
  author={Montoya, R Matthew and Horton, Robert S},
  journal={Journal of social and personal relationships},
  volume={30},
  number={1},
  pages={64--94},
  year={2013},
  publisher={Sage Publications Sage UK: London, England}
}
@article{hinds2000choosing,
  title={Choosing work group members: Balancing similarity, competence, and familiarity},
  author={Hinds, Pamela J and Carley, Kathleen M and Krackhardt, David and Wholey, Doug},
  journal={Organizational behavior and human decision processes},
  volume={81},
  number={2},
  pages={226--251},
  year={2000},
  publisher={Elsevier}
}
@article{zebrowitz2017first,
  title={First impressions from faces},
  author={Zebrowitz, Leslie A},
  journal={Current directions in psychological science},
  volume={26},
  number={3},
  pages={237--242},
  year={2017},
  publisher={Sage Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA}
}
@article{nakano2022you,
  title={You trust a face like yours},
  author={Nakano, Tamami and Yamamoto, Takuto},
  journal={Humanities and Social Sciences Communications},
  volume={9},
  number={1},
  pages={1--6},
  year={2022},
  publisher={Palgrave}
}
@article{debruine2004facial,
  title={Facial resemblance increases the attractiveness of same--sex faces more than other--sex faces},
  author={DeBruine, Lisa M},
  journal={Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences},
  volume={271},
  number={1552},
  pages={2085--2090},
  year={2004},
  publisher={The Royal Society}
}
@article{debruine2002facial,
  title={Facial resemblance enhances trust},
  author={DeBruine, Lisa M},
  journal={Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences},
  volume={269},
  number={1498},
  pages={1307--1312},
  year={2002},
  publisher={The Royal Society}
}
@article{fiske2007universal,
  title={Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence},
  author={Fiske, Susan T and Cuddy, Amy JC and Glick, Peter},
  journal={Trends in cognitive sciences},
  volume={11},
  number={2},
  pages={77--83},
  year={2007},
  publisher={Elsevier}
}
@article{willis2006first,
  title={First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face},
  author={Willis, Janine and Todorov, Alexander},
  journal={Psychological science},
  volume={17},
  number={7},
  pages={592--598},
  year={2006},
  publisher={SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA}
}
@article{montoya2008actual,
  title     = {Is actual similarity necessary for attraction? A meta-analysis of actual and perceived similarity},
  author    = {Montoya, R Matthew and Horton, Robert S and Kirchner, Jeffrey},
  journal   = {Journal of social and personal relationships},
  volume    = {25},
  number    = {6},
  pages     = {889--922},
  year      = {2008},
  publisher = {Sage Publications Sage UK: London, England}
}

@article{yeong1995attitudes,
  title     = {Attitudes and attraction: A developmental study of the similarity-attraction and dissimilarity-repulsion hypotheses},
  author    = {Yeong Tan, Diana Tze and Singh, Ramadhar},
  journal   = {Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin},
  volume    = {21},
  number    = {9},
  pages     = {975--986},
  year      = {1995},
  publisher = {Sage Publications Sage CA: Thousand Oaks, CA}
}