Hi, your result is surprisingly good, but the results I ran were very fuzzy and artificial trace in the holes region, why?
And I think you use (batch: image + mask )as input ,but i use( batch image + 1 mask) as input, Is it possible for this to lead to my unsatisfactory result? However, the problem still exists after I used (batch : image + mask). Thanks!
Hi, your result is surprisingly good, but the results I ran were very fuzzy and artificial trace in the holes region, why?
And I think you use (batch: image + mask )as input ,but i use( batch image + 1 mask) as input, Is it possible for this to lead to my unsatisfactory result? However, the problem still exists after I used (batch : image + mask). Thanks!