Skip to content

Make Gissy faster/better responses #1

Description

@MCarlquist

Note

Created with ai Gemini but reviewed by me human before submission

Title

[Performance] - Code Refactoring for a More Efficient gissy CLI ⚡️

Issue Description

This issue is for a community-driven effort to improve the overall performance, responsiveness, and code quality of the gissy CLI tool. As the project grows, these optimizations will be crucial for a smooth and fast user experience. Contributors are invited to tackle one or more of the specific improvements listed below.

Proposed Improvements

  • Optimize File Watching: The current file watcher triggers tests and linting on every file change. This can be inefficient. We propose implementing a debounce or throttle mechanism to bundle rapid file changes, triggering the checks only once after a brief period of inactivity. This will significantly reduce CPU usage during development.
  • Asynchronous AI API Calls: The tool makes calls to various AI providers. Refactoring these calls to be asynchronous will prevent the main thread from blocking, making the CLI more responsive while waiting for network-dependent AI responses.
  • Efficient Configuration Handling: Reading the .gissyrc.json file on every command can add a small but cumulative performance overhead. Consider implementing a configuration caching mechanism for long-running processes (like the file watcher) to minimize repeated disk I/O operations.
  • Improve String Manipulation: Analyze any areas of heavy string concatenation, particularly within loops, and refactor them to use more efficient methods like string builders to improve performance.

How to Contribute

To ensure a consistent and high-quality contribution, please follow the guidelines in this Pull Request Template.

Labels

  • performance
  • good first issue

Acceptance Criteria

  • All code changes must be well-documented and follow the project's style guidelines.
  • Performance gains should be demonstrable and measurable, where applicable.
  • New or updated unit tests must be included to cover all changes.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions