Skip to content

Commentary #18

Description

@canweriotnow

Since elisp packages have a very structured and opinionated format, requiring a ;;; Commentary: section, it might be good to add some language-specific guidance for each exercise here. I'll update with a running checklist of exercises that have/need commentary, but I figure if Emacs says do it, and it could be helpful to users, who am I to argue?

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions