Several community members
Jon: As long as options existed between, allocating all rewards and nothing. So ideally a percentage setting. This would be an interesting option to help boost the impact.
Susy, [8 Feb 2024 at 14:18:26]:
Well this is an interesting idea. To make sure I've understood what you're proposing - let's say somebody who had accumulated 2k of $DIP rewards through staking would a) 'donate' to pay for say 200 farmers' premiums b) contribute capital to a crop protection risk pool for farmers c) a combination of both
(all numbers illustrative of course)
That donation could be parametric (i.e. you convert $DIP to pay $2k for a claim in case of certain parameters being met) or just flat out (e.g. 200 farmers' x $10 premium)
Is that what you mean @check_the_pivotal_tracker ?
⁰_⁰, [8 Feb 2024 at 15:03:53]:
Yes, supplementing premiums of users in existing risk pools, so option a
Several community members
Jon: As long as options existed between, allocating all rewards and nothing. So ideally a percentage setting. This would be an interesting option to help boost the impact.
Susy, [8 Feb 2024 at 14:18:26]:
Well this is an interesting idea. To make sure I've understood what you're proposing - let's say somebody who had accumulated 2k of $DIP rewards through staking would a) 'donate' to pay for say 200 farmers' premiums b) contribute capital to a crop protection risk pool for farmers c) a combination of both
(all numbers illustrative of course)
That donation could be parametric (i.e. you convert $DIP to pay $2k for a claim in case of certain parameters being met) or just flat out (e.g. 200 farmers' x $10 premium)
Is that what you mean @check_the_pivotal_tracker ?
⁰_⁰, [8 Feb 2024 at 15:03:53]:
Yes, supplementing premiums of users in existing risk pools, so option a