Question: Is group tree data/production network a standard result as of now? If so I have a suggestion
Suggestion:
For the group tree/ production network data, the network/trees can be defined as "GRUPTREE" or "BRANPROP" for given dates. Both GRUPTREE and BRANPROP can be defined at the same date, but both tree types are not necessarily defined/re-defined simultaneously. From an user perspective (in Webviz) it could be of interest to select which tree to investigate. The KEYWORD column often have values GRUPTREE, BRANPROP or WELSPEC.
It could be beneficial to have "tree_type" (i.e. GRUPTREE or BRANPROP) as a part of metadata for a case, so that the user can get possibility to select among existing tree types up front.
Question: Is group tree data/production network a standard result as of now? If so I have a suggestion
Suggestion:
For the group tree/ production network data, the network/trees can be defined as "GRUPTREE" or "BRANPROP" for given dates. Both GRUPTREE and BRANPROP can be defined at the same date, but both tree types are not necessarily defined/re-defined simultaneously. From an user perspective (in Webviz) it could be of interest to select which tree to investigate. The
KEYWORDcolumn often have valuesGRUPTREE,BRANPROPorWELSPEC.It could be beneficial to have "tree_type" (i.e.
GRUPTREEorBRANPROP) as a part of metadata for a case, so that the user can get possibility to select among existing tree types up front.