Skip to content

Latest commit

History

History
66 lines (53 loc) 路 2.15 KB

File metadata and controls

66 lines (53 loc) 路 2.15 KB
schema aether.architecture-document/v1
id egolint-vision
title Egolint Vision
kind architecture-document
version 0.1.0
status provisional
owners
egohygiene
created 2026-08-19
updated 2026-08-19
governed_by
architecture-vision
depends_on
egolint-purpose
related
egolint-principles
egolint-pillars
egolint-manifesto
egolint-epistemology
supersedes

Egolint Vision

Vision statement

every repository can adopt a right-sized quality profile whose results are consistent locally, in containers, and in automation.

Desired future state

  • The core capability is independently usable and documented.
  • Interfaces are versioned, inspectable, and replaceable.
  • Local, self-hosted, and managed contexts can compose the capability without hidden lock-in.
  • People can understand consequential behavior before approving it.
  • Organization integrations strengthen the standalone product rather than making it dependent on the suite.

Intended transformation

The project moves its domain from fragmented, implicit, and manually coordinated behavior toward explicit contracts, reusable automation, and evidence-backed operation.

Anti-vision

one enormous mandatory lint profile that ignores repository context or hides tool ownership.

Directional signals

  • A first-time user can explain the boundary after reading the architecture.
  • A consumer can integrate through a stable public contract.
  • A maintainer can reproduce and validate a release.
  • A contributor can distinguish implemented, proposed, and unavailable capabilities.

Evidence and uncertainty

  • Observed: The repository README establishes the intended boundary as a universal linting platform and extensible MegaLinter wrapper for consistent repository quality; significant implementation remains incomplete.
  • Decided for this draft: The repository owns the bounded concern described here and participates through versioned contracts.
  • Proposed: Target systems and later roadmap phases remain proposals until accepted and implemented.
  • Open question: Which parts of this draft should become active in the first independently versioned release?