Skip to content

BPnPNet Results #7

Description

@roym899

Hi,

I noticed that in the GoMatch paper, the BPnPNet results are quite a bit worse than the numbers reported in their paper. Looking at the following two tables:

BPnPNet reported results for MegaDepth test
Image

GoMatch reported results for MegaDepth test
Image

I guess the retrieval setup might be somewhat different and you retrained the model (maybe due to a different split?), but the difference seems quite large (>10x worse).

Any thoughts what caused this discrepancy?

Thank you 🙂

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Fields

    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions