Skip to content

Convert common objects to real objects/types? #39

Description

@drkameleon

Given that we are handling different types of data repeatedly, through Dictionary values, I think it would make perfect sense to define them as proper types and then create objects (of the aforementioned types) accordingly.

It will make the code quite cleaner + they can be used as part of differentiating what-is-what (instead of relying too much on our core types, which is more than often since this is what we do e.g. for node/edge filters)

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

cleanupCode cleanupengineIssues related the Grafito database engineenhancementNew feature or request

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions