Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 12, 2026. It is now read-only.
This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 12, 2026. It is now read-only.

Chemical potential and charge number error in LDA+DMFT CSC calculation #9

Description

@Fenice-Jin

Dear developers,
I'm trying to repeat the example CSC calculation of LaNiO3. I find that though the dmft.x part works as well as in NCSC calculation, running vaspDMFT results in the follow errors:

...
LDA part: xc-table for Pade appr. of Perdew
found WAVECAR, reading the header
POSCAR, INCAR and KPOINTS ok, starting setup
FFT: planning ...
reading WAVECAR
the WAVECAR file was read successfully
initial charge from wavefunction
DFT+DMFT run with DMFTwDFT
entering main loop
N E dE d eps ncg rms rms(c)
DAV: 1 -0.325174780448E+04 -0.32517E+04 -0.15030E+04 2920 0.177E+03BRMIX: very serious problems
the old and the new charge density differ
old charge density: 29.94236 new 31.09228
0.108E+03
DAV: 2 -0.117777953625E+04 0.20740E+04 -0.20858E+03 2340 0.404E+02 Fail to find mu, increase mu_iter
Fail to find mu, increase mu_iter
Fail to find mu, increase mu_iter
Fail to find mu, increase mu_iter
...
Projection 26 done.
Projection 27 done.
Projection 28 done.
MLWF_WANNIER90: WARNING: wannier90.win seems to contains
a UNIT_CELL_CART block already, I hope it applies to the current setup ...

MLWF_WANNIER90: WARNING: wannier90.win seems to contains
a ATOMS_CART block already, I hope it applies to the current setup ...

MLWF_WANNIER90: WARNING: wannier90.win seems to contains
the MP_GRID tag already, I hope it applies to the current setup ...

MLWF_WANNIER90: WARNING: wannier90.win seems to contains
a KPOINTS block already, I hope it applies to the current setup ...

BRMIX: very serious problems
the old and the new charge density differ
old charge density: 31.54367 new 78.00000
1 F= -.44645718E+03 E0= -.44642453E+03 d E =-.652956E-01
writing wavefunctions

I've tried to increase mu_iter in the INPUT.py from 100 to 1000, but the charge number is still not correct (there are 78 valence electrons.
Thanks for any suggestion!

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions