Paraphrasing from a regular user:
Can we sort the colour palettes to have things which are a bit more scientific, colourblind friendly, and without yellow-on-white?
For the continuous colour plots (DAngle, 3D wireplots, etc), the batlow scheme is available open source in every possible file format (https://zenodo.org/records/8409685) and actually allows instinctual comparison of differences. E.g., for 0-1 normalised data, 0.1/0.3 vs 0.7/0.9 look the same amount of different in batlow, while for rainbow 0.1/0.3 "look" closer than 0.7/0.9.
More detailed info can be read in Crameri, Nature communications 11.1 (2020): 5444.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19160-7
Also, Bang Wong's Nature Methods colourblind frinedly palette (https://www.nature.com/articles/nmeth.1618) which we tend to use, or a selection or a well-known set from a guy called Pol Tol (https://sronpersonalpages.nl/~pault/).
Paraphrasing from a regular user:
Can we sort the colour palettes to have things which are a bit more scientific, colourblind friendly, and without yellow-on-white?
For the continuous colour plots (DAngle, 3D wireplots, etc), the batlow scheme is available open source in every possible file format (https://zenodo.org/records/8409685) and actually allows instinctual comparison of differences. E.g., for 0-1 normalised data, 0.1/0.3 vs 0.7/0.9 look the same amount of different in batlow, while for rainbow 0.1/0.3 "look" closer than 0.7/0.9.
Also, Bang Wong's Nature Methods colourblind frinedly palette (https://www.nature.com/articles/nmeth.1618) which we tend to use, or a selection or a well-known set from a guy called Pol Tol (https://sronpersonalpages.nl/~pault/).