Skip to content

Learning rate scheduler doesn't match as stated in the paper. #10

Description

@v-trungdt21

In the paper, you said that it would be decayed by 10 after 30, 60, 90 epoch for total of 100 epochs. But in the code, I saw that you were using CosineAnnealingRate, which doesn't have the effect as the above.
And also, I saw that u pass T_max hard-code 10 epochs (10 * len(train_loader)) -> is this intentional? Cause this would make the LR varies in a cyclical way.
Thank you for reading and answering.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions