Welcome to conv-emotion Discussions! #48
soujanyaporia
announced in
Announcements
Replies: 3 comments 1 reply
|
In this dilogueGCN model on IEMOCAP using your model, I am getting 55% F1 score. epoch: 60, train_loss: 0.588, train_acc: 80.64, train_fscore: 80.52, In your paper, you are claiming 65.25 |
1 reply
|
Sir
Downloaded the code, along with the IEMOCAP features provided.
Just run the train.py file.
and after 60 Epochs :
epoch: 60, train_loss: 0.5595, train_acc: 82.86, train_fscore: 82.76,
*valid_loss: nan, valid_acc: nan, valid_fscore: nan, *
test_loss: 1.0062, test_acc: 61.49, test_fscore: 60.7,
time: 2.97 sec
Test performance..
F-Score: 60.79
Why valid data is nan, is it because nothing is split into this data
partition?
changing the seed giving me this accuracy and its changing somewhat
everytime.
Is there anything i need to tune for your accuracy sir?
Regards
…On Sat, Jul 30, 2022 at 11:32 AM Deepanway ***@***.***> wrote:
Can you share the full command that you are using for training?
You can also use the alternate implementation in the DialogueGCN-mianzhang
directory.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#48 (reply in thread)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A2ERTZMTEPH2NFNUQ7E2RHLVWTAORANCNFSM5W6E36OQ>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
0 replies
|
Hi Sir, What's the difference between the two versions of implementation of DialogueGCN? Thanks. |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
👋 Welcome!
We’re using Discussions as a place to connect with other members of our community. We hope that you:
build together 💪.
To get started, comment below with an introduction of yourself and tell us about what you do with this community.
All reactions