Skip to content
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Yes — WebFlux is verified since v0.8.0, not just "should work":

  • An integration test in CI boots a real reactive (non-servlet) context on Netty and asserts that reports, startup timings, and ghost analysis all work.
  • Reactive entry points are recognized by the ghost detector: RouterFunction, WebHandler, WebSocketHandler, WebExceptionHandler beans are treated as entry points and never flagged as ghost candidates — so functional-routing apps don't get their handlers wrongly listed.

Everything else is transport-agnostic anyway: the dependency graph comes from getDependenciesForBean(), timings from BufferingApplicationStartup, and conditions from Boot's condition report — none of that cares w…

Replies: 1 comment

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Answer selected by ddsha441981
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
1 participant