Skip to content

incorrectly labeled adducts #10

Description

@abefrandsen

I'm finding large errors between the reported precursor m/z and the theoretical precursor m/z for records where the adduct is labeled [M+Na]+, [M+NH4]+, and [M+K]+. In all the cases I checked (and I would hypothesize this is true for every such case), it appears that the precursor m/z would be correctly explained instead by [M+H]+. The source of my data is: drug_plus.mgf as https://zenodo.org/record/7531170. A particular case is as follows:

BEGIN IONS
PEPMASS=359.1635
RT=N/A
IONMODE=Positive
ADDUCT=[M+Na]+
CHARGE=1
ID=DHSUYTOATWAVLW
SMILES=CC1(C[C@@H]1/C(=N/C(=C\CCCCSC[C@@H](C(=O)O)N)/C(=O)O)/O)C
FORMULA=C16H26N2O5S
FILENAME=NA
DrugBank.ID=NA
INCHIKEY=DHSUYTOATWAVLW-HPTVMLIKSA-N
CPD=NA
Status=NA
CAS=NA
NAME=Massbank:AU212932%%CCMSLIB00005776979
MSLEVEL=2
TIC=3396

(the rest of the record is omitted). Note that the exact mass of the compound here is 358.15624311, so [M+H]+ would explain the given precursor m/z, whereas [M+Na]+ would be much too large.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions