When the meaning of a sentence in an interlinear example is obvious from the glosses (or not important for the argument), I like to exclude the free translation. I currently approximate this with:
::: ex
| Dutch
| Het meisje dat over straat liep.
| The girl that on street walked.
|
:::
But then an empty free translation is included. This is visible with ExPex; note the space between the examples:
When I omit the empty last line, the glosses are used as a translation (not sure if this is a feature or a bug):
::: ex
| Dutch
| Het meisje dat over straat liep.
| The girl that on street walked.
:::
Would it be possible to omit the free translation when it's empty (first example) and/or unspecified (second example)? Or is there already another way to accomplish this?
I would be happy to try and implement this myself, if you let me know what the desired behaviour is.
When the meaning of a sentence in an interlinear example is obvious from the glosses (or not important for the argument), I like to exclude the free translation. I currently approximate this with:
But then an empty free translation is included. This is visible with ExPex; note the space between the examples:
When I omit the empty last line, the glosses are used as a translation (not sure if this is a feature or a bug):
Would it be possible to omit the free translation when it's empty (first example) and/or unspecified (second example)? Or is there already another way to accomplish this?
I would be happy to try and implement this myself, if you let me know what the desired behaviour is.