Hi Chen Xi! This is Fiona Fan, your dear friend, commenting on your poster.
I really like your presentation today for your poster. I also enjoy the overall layout of the poster. The Chicago Red always has the magic of making a good poster look better. For the background section, I think it's a great introduction to temporal discounting and the previous existent models. However, would it serve your purpose better if the words can be better summarized by bullet points to save some space? The same can go to data and methods section. The poster overall seems to be packing in a lot of information, so maybe using bullet point can save some much valued space for some more information? Also, Maybe a prior mention of the full name ITCH would be good since there's a whole section devoted to explaining the data collected on this? For model comparisons, I wonder if it would be a good idea to concatenate 12 individual graphs in to two panels of six graphs. It would make the comparison straight forward and easy on the eye for the audience. The conclusion section was also very concise and to the point, but maybe you could add in a future direction section as well? Overall I think it's a great poster! :)
Hi Chen Xi! This is Fiona Fan, your dear friend, commenting on your poster.
I really like your presentation today for your poster. I also enjoy the overall layout of the poster. The Chicago Red always has the magic of making a good poster look better. For the background section, I think it's a great introduction to temporal discounting and the previous existent models. However, would it serve your purpose better if the words can be better summarized by bullet points to save some space? The same can go to data and methods section. The poster overall seems to be packing in a lot of information, so maybe using bullet point can save some much valued space for some more information? Also, Maybe a prior mention of the full name ITCH would be good since there's a whole section devoted to explaining the data collected on this? For model comparisons, I wonder if it would be a good idea to concatenate 12 individual graphs in to two panels of six graphs. It would make the comparison straight forward and easy on the eye for the audience. The conclusion section was also very concise and to the point, but maybe you could add in a future direction section as well? Overall I think it's a great poster! :)