Skip to content

Get rid of those pesky ks #126

Description

@hannahkamundson

Barring a good reason that I'm unaware of, I don't believe we should have such an abundance of un-descriptive Ks peppering our code. They are often paired with other values that strike the balance between descriptive and concise (i.e. lDiv, rDiv). I however believe that a solitary k is a kontraction that kountervails against sensible konventions of readability, running the risk of konverting klean kode into an inskrutable koan!

I'll probably take kare of this in my own time, as I klearly think such konsiderations are worthy of koncern! I will however leave this issue up in the near term to kommunicate my diskontent over such foibles, which, If I'm being honest, are often kommitted by yours truly also... sweat_smile

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    BeginnerA good task for entry level peoplefrontend

    Type

    No type

    Fields

    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions