Skip to content

Problem about Reproducing Paper Results of Explicit 3DGS model (Our-3D-GS in the Table) #19

Description

@KDCG

Hi. Thanks for your Excellent Work.

When attempting to reproduce the results from the Our-3D-GS table, I found that I was unable to replicate the results as shown on NeRF-Synthetic and TandT datasets

Specifically, I used the script below, adjusting only the parameters related to the dataset path.

python train.py --config config/explicit/3D/lod_sh2_mean.yaml

get tandt/train datasets result as shown:

Image

Image

but I find that i didn't meet such problem on mipnerf datasets (at least not such problem on mipnerf/bicycle datasets):

Image

Image

I also find that I can't reproduce good result on NeRF-Synthetic datasets. with using both the scirpt shown below:

python train.py --config config/explicit/3D/lod_sh2_mean.yaml
python train.py --config config/implicit/3D/lod_sh2_mean.yaml

I believe it is partly from the alpha_mask when handling the NeRF-Synthetic datasets as the issuse: https://github.com/graphdeco-inria/gaussian-splatting/issues/1038

However, after commenting out the code related to alpha_mask in the training script, I still couldn't achieve good results on the NeRF-Synthetic datasets.

Could you guide me on how to fix this issue?

By the way, when attempting to reproduce the results from another one of your repositories, Octree-GS, I didn’t encounter any issues on both NeRF-Synthetic datasets and TandT datasets.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions